Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
971 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 971 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 971 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Fazio Frank's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fazio Frank's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 971 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fazio Frank's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fazio Frank's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
07:29.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 971 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Frank Fazio, competing in the HYROX, Age Group 30-34, demonstrated a commendable performance, finishing in the top 46% of all athletes and top 52% of his age group. His overall running time was slower than the average, suggesting that Frank has a strength-based profile and might benefit from additional focus on running training.
Frank's performance in the initial segments of the race was impressive, as he started faster than average in Running 1, Ski Erg, and Sled Push. However, his pace seemed to slow down in the later segments, particularly notable in Running 3 and Running 4, which indicates that he might have started too fast and struggled to maintain his initial pace. His Roxzone performance was faster than average, suggesting good transition times and overall fitness.
Segments to Improve:
Burpees Broad Jump: This was Frank's weakest segment, with a significantly slower performance than average. To improve, Frank could incorporate high-intensity interval training (HIIT) focusing on burpees and broad jumps into his routine. This will help build endurance, speed, and strength. An example of this could be doing sets of 20 burpees followed by 10 broad jumps, repeated 5 times, with minimal rest between sets.
Overall Running: As Frank's overall running time was slower than average, he should focus on enhancing his running capacity. Interval running training could be an effective way to improve his aerobic fitness and speed. For instance, he could run at a high speed for one minute, then jog or walk for two minutes, repeating this for 20-30 minutes. Additionally, hill running could help improve his strength and endurance.
Wall Balls: Frank's performance in this segment was slightly below average. He could benefit from incorporating more functional strength workouts into his routine, focusing on lower body and core strength. Squats, lunges, and medicine ball exercises could be beneficial.
Sandbag Lunges: While Frank was faster than average in this segment, there's still room for improvement. He can increase his strength and stability by including more lunges and weighted workouts in his training, like sandbag squats and lunges.
Race Strategies:
Frank should consider modifying his race strategy to better manage his energy and pace throughout the race. Rather than starting out too fast, he could aim for a steady, maintainable pace that allows him to conserve energy for the later segments of the race. This could help him maintain a more consistent performance and prevent slowdowns in the later stages.
Given his strength-based profile, Frank might also benefit from focusing on strength-based segments where he can gain time, while also working to improve his running skills to reduce time lost on running segments. Lastly, practicing transitions between segments could help reduce his Roxzone time, further improving his overall performance.