Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hartmann Tim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hartmann Tim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hartmann Tim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hartmann Tim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:07 | 43:15 to 40:08 | 87.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:11 to 01:57 | 6.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 04:41 to 04:33 | 3.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 04:41 to 04:39 | 0.9% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:41 to 04:39 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:11 to 03:11 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Hartmann Tim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:35 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 04:35 | 04:23 -00:07 | 04:29 +00:06 |
| Running 2 | 04:41 | 08:51 | 04:49 -00:08 | 08:52 -00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:06 | 13:32 | 02:47 -00:41 | 13:41 -00:09 |
| Running 3 | 05:31 | 15:38 | 05:13 +00:18 | 16:28 -00:50 |
| Sled Pull | 03:11 | 21:09 | 04:41 -01:30 | 21:41 -00:32 |
| Running 4 | 05:30 | 24:20 | 05:11 +00:19 | 26:22 -02:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:41 | 29:50 | 04:59 -00:18 | 31:33 -01:43 |
| Running 5 | 05:22 | 34:31 | 05:21 +00:01 | 36:32 -02:01 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 39:53 | 04:44 -00:03 | 41:53 -02:00 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 44:34 | 05:14 +00:01 | 46:37 -02:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 49:49 | 02:07 +00:04 | 51:51 -02:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 52:00 | 05:12 +00:03 | 53:58 -01:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:41 | 57:15 | 04:51 -00:10 | 59:10 -01:55 |
| Running 8 | 07:09 | 01:01:56 | 05:43 +01:26 | 01:04:01 -02:05 |
| Wall Balls | 04:59 | 01:09:05 | 06:10 -01:11 | 01:09:44 -00:39 |
| Roxzone | 08:18 | 01:22:16 | 06:22 +01:56 | 01:22:16 |
Best Lap, Running 4, Running 3, and Running 1 also showed areas for improvement. Tim should focus on incorporating specific drills and exercises to address the weaknesses identified in these segments. For example, incorporating interval training, hill sprints, and plyometric exercises can help improve his speed and endurance during these running segments. Additionally, practicing proper running form and technique, such as maintaining a strong core and efficient arm swing, will also contribute to improved performance.
Overall, Tim Hartmann had a strong performance in the HYROX race, but there are areas for improvement. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques tailored to address his weaknesses, Tim can enhance his overall performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dominici Massimiliano Giacomo | 2023 Barcelona | 01:22:00 | |
| De Haro Wizner Abel | 2023 Malaga | 01:22:41 | |
| Chapman Jordan | 2023 Dublin | 01:21:51 | |
| Philippon Camille | 2024 Paris | 01:22:25 | |
| Coldefy Thibault | 2024 Marseille | 01:22:00 | |
| Webb Archie | 2024 London | 01:21:53 | |
| Chalcraft Luke | 2024 Birmingham | 01:21:48 | |
| Marsh Richie | 2023 London | 01:22:15 | |
| Van De Pol John | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:22:06 | |
| Schnitger Christopher | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:22:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:19:21 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
