Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van De Pol John's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van De Pol John's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van De Pol John's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van De Pol John's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:41 | 41:49 to 40:08 | 36.2% |
| Sled Push | 01:22 | 03:55 to 02:33 | 29.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:29 | 04:51 to 04:22 | 10.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 06:02 to 05:40 | 7.9% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 04:57 to 04:39 | 6.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:32 to 04:18 | 5.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:10 to 01:57 | 4.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Van De Pol John | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:01 | 00:00 | 04:30 -01:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 03:01 | 04:23 +00:09 | 04:30 -01:29 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 07:33 | 04:48 +00:06 | 08:53 -01:20 |
| Sled Push | 03:55 | 12:27 | 02:46 +01:09 | 13:41 -01:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:39 | 16:22 | 05:12 +00:27 | 16:27 -00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 04:51 | 22:01 | 04:41 +00:10 | 21:39 +00:22 |
| Running 4 | 05:21 | 26:52 | 05:09 +00:12 | 26:20 +00:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:02 | 32:13 | 04:59 -00:57 | 31:29 +00:44 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 36:15 | 05:20 +00:11 | 36:28 -00:13 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 41:46 | 04:44 +00:13 | 41:48 -00:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 46:43 | 05:13 +00:17 | 46:32 +00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 52:13 | 02:07 +00:03 | 51:45 +00:28 |
| Running 7 | 05:38 | 54:23 | 05:10 +00:28 | 53:52 +00:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:09 | 01:00:01 | 04:51 -00:42 | 59:02 +00:59 |
| Running 8 | 06:17 | 01:04:10 | 05:42 +00:35 | 01:03:53 +00:17 |
| Wall Balls | 06:02 | 01:10:27 | 06:10 -00:08 | 01:09:35 +00:52 |
| Roxzone | 05:45 | 01:22:06 | 06:21 -00:36 | 01:22:06 |
In terms of the overall time, John completed the race in 01:22:06. His total running time was 00:41:49, which was 02:20 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that John may benefit from improving his overall fitness and his transition time between exercise zones (roxzone). Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:03:01 indicates a strong running capability.
In conclusion, John Van De Pol had a strong performance in the Hyrox race in Amsterdam. While he demonstrated good overall performance, there are areas for improvement, including the run total, sled push, and several running segments. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength training, and mental preparation, John can enhance his performance in these areas and further improve his race results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Marshall Ollie | 2024 London | 01:22:22 | |
| Brown Benjamin | 2023 London | 01:21:54 | |
| Monici Stefano | 2024 Milan | 01:21:45 | |
| Sullivan Jeremiah | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:58 | |
| Jahanfar Amir | 2022 Hamburg | 01:22:35 | |
| Rimmer Logan | 2024 Brisbane | 01:21:51 | |
| Zahra Christian | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:22:02 | |
| Del Buono Andrea | 2023 Milan | 01:22:27 | |
| Grimalis Tadas | 2023 Köln | 01:21:39 | |
| La Rana Renato | 2024 Milan | 01:22:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
