Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gnisci Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gnisci Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gnisci Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gnisci Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:14 | 07:51 to 05:37 | 64.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:29 | 04:57 to 04:28 | 14.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:18 | 02:48 to 02:30 | 8.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:20 to 02:05 | 7.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 | 04:31 to 04:20 | 5.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:07 to 43:07 | 0.0% |
| Gnisci Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:22 | 00:00 | 05:07 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:54 | 04:22 | 05:05 -00:11 | 05:07 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 04:47 | 09:16 | 05:25 -00:38 | 10:12 -00:56 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 14:03 | 02:40 +00:08 | 15:37 -01:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 16:51 | 05:43 -00:29 | 18:17 -01:26 |
| Sled Pull | 05:11 | 22:05 | 05:36 -00:25 | 24:00 -01:55 |
| Running 4 | 05:45 | 27:16 | 05:44 +00:01 | 29:36 -02:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:51 | 33:01 | 05:58 +01:53 | 35:20 -02:19 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 40:52 | 05:53 -00:05 | 41:18 -00:26 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 46:40 | 05:20 -00:10 | 47:11 -00:31 |
| Running 6 | 05:35 | 51:50 | 05:47 -00:12 | 52:31 -00:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:20 | 57:25 | 02:14 +00:06 | 58:18 -00:53 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 59:45 | 05:44 -00:12 | 01:00:32 -00:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:57 | 01:05:17 | 04:41 +00:16 | 01:06:16 -00:59 |
| Running 8 | 06:08 | 01:10:14 | 06:07 +00:01 | 01:10:57 -00:43 |
| Wall Balls | 04:31 | 01:16:22 | 04:51 -00:20 | 01:17:04 -00:42 |
| Roxzone | 07:45 | 01:28:32 | 06:37 +01:08 | 01:28:32 |
Sarah Gnisci showcased an impressive performance in the 2024 Hamburg HYROX race, finishing in the top 13% of all athletes and top 16% within her age group (30-34). A key highlight of her performance was her total running time, which was 2 minutes and 46 seconds faster than the average. This indicates that Sarah has a strong runner profile and her pace management during the race was particularly effective, as her splits from running 1 to running 4 were consistently faster than the average. However, her performance in the Roxzone and during several strength-focused segments suggest potential areas for improvement.
Despite her overall great performance, there are several segments where Sarah's performance was slower than average.
Implementing specific race strategies can further enhance Sarah's performance. Here are some suggestions:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Olst Marian | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:28:56 | |
| Guzzardi Daniela | 2024 Rimini | 01:28:53 | |
| Pyshchyk Olha | 2021 Madrid | 01:28:53 | |
| Mazariegos Diana | 2024 Dallas | 01:28:55 | |
| Rembert Sandrine | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:28:36 | |
| Philippsen Inga | 2024 Hamburg | 01:28:08 | |
| Saucedo Francisco | 2023 Dallas | 01:28:53 | |
| Schwarzenberg Hanne | 2023 Hamburg | 01:28:21 | |
| Méndez Fernanda | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:28:49 | |
| Omalley Alexis | 2022 New York | 01:28:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
