Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 230 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Eijkemans Netty's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Eijkemans Netty's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Eijkemans Netty's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Eijkemans Netty's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:55 | 10:52 to 07:57 | 58.9% |
| Wall Balls | 01:21 | 09:05 to 07:44 | 27.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:20 | 09:37 to 09:17 | 6.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 03:10 to 02:58 | 4.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:09 | 06:57 to 06:48 | 3.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:37 to 05:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:02 to 03:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:59 to 05:59 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 57:16 to 57:16 | 0.0% |
| Eijkemans Netty | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:40 | 00:00 | 06:15 -01:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:37 | 04:40 | 05:35 +00:02 | 06:15 -01:35 |
| Running 2 | 06:42 | 10:17 | 06:52 -00:10 | 11:50 -01:33 |
| Sled Push | 03:02 | 16:59 | 03:34 -00:32 | 18:42 -01:43 |
| Running 3 | 06:54 | 20:01 | 07:27 -00:33 | 22:16 -02:15 |
| Sled Pull | 10:52 | 26:55 | 07:37 +03:15 | 29:43 -02:48 |
| Running 4 | 07:23 | 37:47 | 07:25 -00:02 | 37:20 +00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:37 | 45:10 | 09:57 -00:20 | 44:45 +00:25 |
| Running 5 | 07:19 | 54:47 | 08:07 -00:48 | 54:42 +00:05 |
| Rowing | 05:59 | 01:02:06 | 06:03 -00:04 | 01:02:49 -00:43 |
| Running 6 | 07:29 | 01:08:05 | 07:41 -00:12 | 01:08:52 -00:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:10 | 01:15:34 | 02:49 +00:21 | 01:16:33 -00:59 |
| Running 7 | 07:49 | 01:18:44 | 07:42 +00:07 | 01:19:22 -00:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:57 | 01:26:33 | 07:18 -00:21 | 01:27:04 -00:31 |
| Running 8 | 09:04 | 01:33:30 | 08:57 +00:07 | 01:34:22 -00:52 |
| Wall Balls | 09:05 | 01:42:34 | 07:43 +01:22 | 01:43:19 -00:45 |
| Roxzone | 09:44 | 02:01:15 | 10:13 -00:29 | 02:01:15 |
Netty Eijkemans delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank of 1012, placing her in the top 32% of all competitors. Within her age group (55-59), she ranked 20th, which is an impressive top 28% performance. Her overall time of 02:01:15 reflects a strong balance of endurance and strength, with her total running time of 00:57:16 being notably 5:00 faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. Her initial pacing was strategic, with the first few running segments significantly faster than average, suggesting a well-planned race start without being overly aggressive.
The sled pull was a challenging segment for Netty, ranking in the 94th percentile. To enhance performance, focus on upper body and core strength.
Improving wall ball performance requires enhanced leg power and accuracy.
Enhancing grip strength and stability will improve performance in this segment.
Focus on explosive power and endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mills Lorraine | 2023 London | 02:01:29 | |
| Robinson Abbie | 2024 Glasgow | 02:01:42 | |
| Montes Acuca María Fernanda | 2024 Mexico City | 02:01:13 | |
| Oberzaucher Judith | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 02:00:53 | |
| Orta América | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:01:38 | |
| Juin Alysee | 2024 Marseille | 02:00:46 | |
| Kelly Nicola | 2024 Stockholm | 02:01:20 | |
| Miller Lucy | 2024 Glasgow | 02:01:45 | |
| Kraft Roxanne | 2021 Dallas | 02:01:19 | |
| Stephens Alannah | 2023 Dublin | 02:01:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 02:08:39 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:56:22 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:58:58 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:53:27 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
