Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Alamo Roca Pablo's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Alamo Roca Pablo's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Alamo Roca Pablo's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Alamo Roca Pablo's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:33 | 44:12 to 40:39 | 70.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:46 | 05:14 to 04:28 | 15.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:35 to 04:20 | 5.0% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 04:55 to 04:40 | 5.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:12 to 01:59 | 4.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:34 to 02:34 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:13 to 03:13 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Alamo Roca Pablo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:12 | 00:00 | 04:30 -00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 04:12 | 04:24 +00:11 | 04:30 -00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 08:47 | 04:52 +00:09 | 08:54 -00:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:34 | 13:48 | 02:52 -00:18 | 13:46 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:55 | 16:22 | 05:16 +00:39 | 16:38 -00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 05:14 | 22:17 | 04:47 +00:27 | 21:54 +00:23 |
| Running 4 | 05:58 | 27:31 | 05:14 +00:44 | 26:41 +00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:13 | 33:29 | 05:03 -01:50 | 31:55 +01:34 |
| Running 5 | 05:55 | 36:42 | 05:23 +00:32 | 36:58 -00:16 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 42:37 | 04:45 +00:10 | 42:21 +00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 47:32 | 05:16 +00:21 | 47:06 +00:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 53:09 | 02:08 +00:04 | 52:22 +00:47 |
| Running 7 | 05:21 | 55:21 | 05:15 +00:06 | 54:30 +00:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:44 | 01:00:42 | 04:55 -01:11 | 59:45 +00:57 |
| Running 8 | 06:15 | 01:04:26 | 05:48 +00:27 | 01:04:40 -00:14 |
| Wall Balls | 05:25 | 01:10:41 | 06:16 -00:51 | 01:10:28 +00:13 |
| Roxzone | 07:12 | 01:23:12 | 06:28 +00:44 | 01:23:12 |
Pacing and Profile Analysis:
Based on the analysis of the splits, it can be determined that Pablo has a relatively balanced profile, with no significant advantages or weaknesses in either running or strength-based exercises. However, his overall running time was slower than average, indicating that he may benefit from focusing more on improving his running abilities.
In conclusion, Pablo Alamo Roca had a strong performance in the HYROX race in Madrid. To improve his overall performance, he should focus on improving his running abilities, specifically his endurance and speed. Incorporating specific running drills, interval training, and strength and conditioning exercises can help enhance his performance in the identified areas of improvement. Additionally, focusing on efficient transitions and mental preparation will contribute to his success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Carr Andy | 2024 Dublin | 01:23:03 | |
| Donker John | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:20 | |
| Derewonko Krzysztof | 2024 Katowice | 01:22:57 | |
| Duin Rudy | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:23:40 | |
| Cox Andrew | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:05 | |
| Mitchell Matthew | 2022 Manchester | 01:22:53 | |
| Barge Charles | 2024 Marseille | 01:22:45 | |
| Dino Augusto Costa | 2024 Madrid | 01:23:16 | |
| Kaplan Ian | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:23:02 | |
| Watson Matthew | 2024 Brisbane | 01:23:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
