Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cox Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cox Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cox Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cox Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:07 | 06:50 to 04:43 | 60.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 05:03 to 04:26 | 17.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:37 | 06:22 to 05:45 | 17.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:07 | 04:44 to 04:37 | 3.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:00 to 01:58 | 1.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:38 to 38:38 | 0.0% |
| Cox Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:15 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 05:15 | 04:24 -00:19 | 04:29 +00:46 |
| Running 2 | 04:27 | 09:20 | 04:51 -00:24 | 08:53 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 13:47 | 02:51 -00:21 | 13:44 +00:03 |
| Running 3 | 04:42 | 16:17 | 05:16 -00:34 | 16:35 -00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 05:03 | 20:59 | 04:45 +00:18 | 21:51 -00:52 |
| Running 4 | 04:50 | 26:02 | 05:14 -00:24 | 26:36 -00:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:50 | 30:52 | 05:02 +01:48 | 31:50 -00:58 |
| Running 5 | 04:54 | 37:42 | 05:24 -00:30 | 36:52 +00:50 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 42:36 | 04:45 -00:10 | 42:16 +00:20 |
| Running 6 | 04:46 | 47:11 | 05:16 -00:30 | 47:01 +00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 51:57 | 02:07 -00:07 | 52:17 -00:20 |
| Running 7 | 04:44 | 53:57 | 05:15 -00:31 | 54:24 -00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:44 | 58:41 | 04:54 -00:10 | 59:39 -00:58 |
| Running 8 | 05:03 | 01:03:25 | 05:47 -00:44 | 01:04:33 -01:08 |
| Wall Balls | 06:22 | 01:08:28 | 06:15 +00:07 | 01:10:20 -01:52 |
| Roxzone | 08:23 | 01:23:05 | 06:30 +01:53 | 01:23:05 |
Andrew Cox's performance in the 2024 Birmingham race highlights his exceptional running capabilities. His total running time of 00:38:38 was 03:10 faster than average, placing him well in the top 30% of all athletes. He maintained a consistent pace throughout the race, with every running segment faster than the average. His best running lap was an impressive 00:04:27. This indicates a strong running profile, suggesting his training has focused on endurance and speed.
However, his overall performance was hampered by slower times in strength-based segments and transitions. Most notably, his time in the Roxzone was 01:58 slower than average, indicating he may have been resting or transitioning slowly between exercises. His slowest segments compared to the average were the Burpees Broad Jump, Wall Balls, and Sled Pull, suggesting a need for more strength training.
For future races, Andrew should aim to maintain his strong running performance while focusing on improving his strength-based segments and transition times. During the race, he may want to consider pacing himself more conservatively in the early running segments to conserve energy for the strength-based segments. Additionally, practicing transitions between different exercises could help to decrease his Roxzone time.
Lastly, incorporating strength training exercises into his routine, particularly those that mimic the movements of the strength-based segments, could help to improve his overall performance. This combined approach of maintaining running performance while improving strength and transitions could help Andrew improve his overall rank in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nunez Andres | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:23:24 | |
| Dürrling Daniel | 2024 Berlin | 01:23:20 | |
| Pellen Volker | 2022 Bremen | 01:23:20 | |
| Cavallini Gregory | 2024 Marseille | 01:23:15 | |
| Schlicke Danny | 2019 Wien | 01:23:25 | |
| Bleser Matthias | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:23:01 | |
| Teague Matthew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:47 | |
| Carr James | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:22:52 | |
| Mckay Michael | 2023 Barcelona | 01:22:41 | |
| Rohweder Christian | 2023 Hamburg | 01:22:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Manchester | 01:22:42 | |
| 2022 London | 01:19:17 | |
| 2024 Poznan | 01:23:52 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:22:34 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:25:17 | |
| 2023 London | 01:21:57 | |
| 2023 London | 01:22:34 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
