Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 747 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wright Lyndsey Margaret's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wright Lyndsey Margaret's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wright Lyndsey Margaret's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wright Lyndsey Margaret's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:31 | 08:52 to 07:21 | 44.0% |
| Run Total | 01:15 | 52:15 to 51:00 | 36.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:41 | 06:37 to 05:56 | 19.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:59 to 05:59 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:29 to 05:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Wright Lyndsey Margaret | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:01 | 00:00 | 05:37 +01:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:51 | 07:01 | 05:22 -00:31 | 05:37 +01:24 |
| Running 2 | 06:02 | 11:52 | 06:09 -00:07 | 10:59 +00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 17:54 | 03:07 -00:39 | 17:08 +00:46 |
| Running 3 | 06:26 | 20:22 | 06:31 -00:05 | 20:15 +00:07 |
| Sled Pull | 05:59 | 26:48 | 06:45 -00:46 | 26:46 +00:02 |
| Running 4 | 06:37 | 32:47 | 06:34 +00:03 | 33:31 -00:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:52 | 39:24 | 07:34 +01:18 | 40:05 -00:41 |
| Running 5 | 06:43 | 48:16 | 06:45 -00:02 | 47:39 +00:37 |
| Rowing | 05:29 | 54:59 | 05:42 -00:13 | 54:24 +00:35 |
| Running 6 | 06:25 | 01:00:28 | 06:36 -00:11 | 01:00:06 +00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 01:06:53 | 02:31 -00:33 | 01:06:42 +00:11 |
| Running 7 | 06:11 | 01:08:51 | 06:37 -00:26 | 01:09:13 -00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:58 | 01:15:02 | 05:42 -00:44 | 01:15:50 -00:48 |
| Running 8 | 06:55 | 01:20:00 | 07:16 -00:21 | 01:21:32 -01:32 |
| Wall Balls | 06:37 | 01:26:55 | 06:08 +00:29 | 01:28:48 -01:53 |
| Roxzone | 09:58 | 01:43:21 | 08:25 +01:33 | 01:43:21 |
Lyndsey Margaret Wright delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race, ranking in the top 24% of all athletes and top 22% in her age group. Her overall running time was notably impressive, being 27 seconds faster than the average. This indicates that Lyndsey has a strong runner's profile, however, there is scope for improvement in her transition times and strength training. It is observed that Lyndsey started the race slower than the average in the first running segment but then gradually picked up the pace in the subsequent segments. This suggests a need for a more strategic approach to pacing at the beginning of the race.
Lyndsey's performance fell short in the Roxzone, Burpees Broad Jump, Wall Balls, and total running time. Here are some specific recommendations:
For better performance in future races, Lyndsey should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forte Natalie | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:43:02 | |
| Brooks Michele | 2023 Birmingham | 01:43:41 | |
| Randazzo Lou | 2024 Sydney | 01:42:58 | |
| Lapergue Camille | 2024 Paris | 01:43:15 | |
| 強 怡廷 | 2024 Taipei | 01:43:37 | |
| B Jen | 2024 Paris | 01:43:02 | |
| Falklander Frida | 2023 Stockholm | 01:43:11 | |
| Brouwer Cobie | 2024 Maastricht | 01:43:16 | |
| Cavanna Elena | 2024 Rimini | 01:43:46 | |
| Shek Jacqueline | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:43:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
