Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 985 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mckinley Emma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mckinley Emma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mckinley Emma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mckinley Emma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:45 | 52:43 to 48:58 | 55.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:33 | 06:58 to 05:25 | 22.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:10 | 07:58 to 06:48 | 17.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 05:31 to 05:13 | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:40 to 05:40 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:16 to 05:16 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Mckinley Emma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:40 | 00:00 | 05:29 -01:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 03:40 | 05:18 -00:22 | 05:29 -01:49 |
| Running 2 | 06:08 | 08:36 | 05:53 +00:15 | 10:47 -02:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:10 | 14:44 | 02:59 -00:49 | 16:40 -01:56 |
| Running 3 | 07:08 | 16:54 | 06:14 +00:54 | 19:39 -02:45 |
| Sled Pull | 05:40 | 24:02 | 06:24 -00:44 | 25:53 -01:51 |
| Running 4 | 07:18 | 29:42 | 06:15 +01:03 | 32:17 -02:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:58 | 37:00 | 07:08 +00:50 | 38:32 -01:32 |
| Running 5 | 07:46 | 44:58 | 06:26 +01:20 | 45:40 -00:42 |
| Rowing | 05:16 | 52:44 | 05:36 -00:20 | 52:06 +00:38 |
| Running 6 | 07:32 | 58:00 | 06:20 +01:12 | 57:42 +00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 01:05:32 | 02:26 -00:27 | 01:04:02 +01:30 |
| Running 7 | 07:36 | 01:07:31 | 06:18 +01:18 | 01:06:28 +01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:31 | 01:15:07 | 05:24 +00:07 | 01:12:46 +02:21 |
| Running 8 | 05:39 | 01:20:38 | 06:58 -01:19 | 01:18:10 +02:28 |
| Wall Balls | 06:58 | 01:26:17 | 05:41 +01:17 | 01:25:08 +01:09 |
| Roxzone | 05:35 | 01:38:41 | 07:52 -02:17 | 01:38:41 |
Emma McKinley performed significantly well in her age group and overall, ranking in the top 21% of all athletes and the top 17% of her age group. This shows a solid overall physical performance with strength and endurance both playing a key role in her achievement. However, there are a few areas that can be improved to boost her performance further.
Emma's total running time was slower than the average, indicating a need for focus on running endurance and speed. She started the race strong with her first running segment faster than average, but her pace decreased as the race progressed. This suggests that she might have started too fast, leading to fatigue in the later stages of the race. Emma's strength seems to be her strong point, with faster than average times in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Rowing, and Farmers Carry segments. Her Roxzone time was also significantly faster than average, indicating good overall fitness and efficient transition times.
Emma should consider pacing herself better during the race. Starting off a little slower and conserving energy for the later stages can help improve her overall performance. She should also focus on maintaining consistent pace throughout the running segments. Given her strength in the exercise segments, Emma should capitalize on these to gain time.
During her training, Emma should work on her transitions to maintain her speed and efficiency in the Roxzone. Practicing smooth transitions between running and strength exercises can also help save time and energy during the race. Furthermore, incorporating more running endurance and strength exercises into her training routine can help improve her overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rault Jeanne | 2023 Malaga | 01:38:17 | |
| Hübner Sophia | 2018 Hamburg | 01:39:05 | |
| Mannering Victoria | 2023 Birmingham | 01:38:55 | |
| UrywkowTchang Ewa | 2024 Singapore | 01:38:16 | |
| Szabo Eni | 2021 London | 01:38:15 | |
| Gracia Alegría | 2022 Valencia | 01:38:21 | |
| Bitterbier Tina | 2019 Leipzig | 01:38:49 | |
| Burnett Hazel | 2024 Dublin | 01:38:24 | |
| Gal Zsuzsi | 2024 Melbourne | 01:39:01 | |
| Hernández Moreno Ana Isabel | 2024 Madrid | 01:39:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
