Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mc Cann Shane's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mc Cann Shane's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mc Cann Shane's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mc Cann Shane's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:46 | 05:38 to 03:52 | 33.3% |
| Run Total | 01:24 | 37:57 to 36:33 | 26.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:38 | 05:30 to 04:52 | 11.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 | 04:24 to 03:57 | 8.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:23 | 04:10 to 03:47 | 7.2% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 04:43 to 04:26 | 5.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 02:27 to 02:11 | 5.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:15 to 04:08 | 2.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:32 to 01:32 | 0.0% |
| Mc Cann Shane | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:55 | 00:00 | 04:11 -01:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 02:55 | 04:17 -00:02 | 04:11 -01:16 |
| Running 2 | 04:30 | 07:10 | 04:28 +00:02 | 08:28 -01:18 |
| Sled Push | 02:27 | 11:40 | 02:34 -00:07 | 12:56 -01:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 14:07 | 04:50 +00:42 | 15:30 -01:23 |
| Sled Pull | 04:10 | 19:39 | 04:13 -00:03 | 20:20 -00:41 |
| Running 4 | 04:58 | 23:49 | 04:48 +00:10 | 24:33 -00:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:38 | 28:47 | 04:23 +01:15 | 29:21 -00:34 |
| Running 5 | 06:40 | 34:25 | 04:55 +01:45 | 33:44 +00:41 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 41:05 | 04:34 +00:09 | 38:39 +02:26 |
| Running 6 | 04:55 | 45:48 | 04:50 +00:05 | 43:13 +02:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:32 | 50:43 | 01:55 -00:23 | 48:03 +02:40 |
| Running 7 | 04:54 | 52:15 | 04:49 +00:05 | 49:58 +02:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:24 | 57:09 | 04:22 +00:02 | 54:47 +02:22 |
| Running 8 | 03:35 | 01:01:33 | 05:11 -01:36 | 59:09 +02:24 |
| Wall Balls | 05:30 | 01:05:08 | 05:25 +00:05 | 01:04:20 +00:48 |
| Roxzone | 04:45 | 01:15:17 | 05:32 -00:47 | 01:15:17 |
Shane Mc Cann demonstrated a commendable performance in the Dublin 2024 HYROX event. His overall rank of 416 placed him in the top 15% of all athletes, and within his age group, he finished in the top 17%. His total running time was notably faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. His pacing strategy was primarily effective, with a particularly swift start in Running 1. However, there was a notable slowdown in the later running segments, which suggests the need for endurance improvement. His roxzone time was also faster than average, indicating efficient transitions and good overall fitness.
Shane should consider implementing the following strategies in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Crampton Matt | 2023 Birmingham | 01:15:08 | |
| Henderson Kaz | 2023 London | 01:15:08 | |
| Schubert Marcel | 2022 Leipzig | 01:15:26 | |
| Palmer Ross | 2024 Manchester | 01:15:26 | |
| Thewes Robin | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:15:20 | |
| Lowe Hamish | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:15:00 | |
| Falkenberg Sven | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:15:47 | |
| Wiegele Stefan | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:14:47 | |
| Lim Jimmy | 2024 Paris | 01:14:48 | |
| Kelly Andy | 2024 Manchester | 01:14:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
