Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Johnston Scott's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Johnston Scott's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Johnston Scott's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Johnston Scott's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:53 | 40:11 to 38:18 | 36.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:29 | 05:43 to 04:14 | 29.1% |
| Wall Balls | 01:08 | 06:22 to 05:14 | 22.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 02:09 to 01:49 | 6.5% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 04:48 to 04:32 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Johnston Scott | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:55 | 00:00 | 04:19 -01:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 02:55 | 04:20 -00:07 | 04:19 -01:24 |
| Running 2 | 04:42 | 07:08 | 04:37 +00:05 | 08:39 -01:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 11:50 | 02:40 -00:25 | 13:16 -01:26 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 14:05 | 05:00 +00:22 | 15:56 -01:51 |
| Sled Pull | 03:58 | 19:27 | 04:26 -00:28 | 20:56 -01:29 |
| Running 4 | 05:27 | 23:25 | 04:59 +00:28 | 25:22 -01:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:43 | 28:52 | 04:38 +01:05 | 30:21 -01:29 |
| Running 5 | 06:11 | 34:35 | 05:07 +01:04 | 34:59 -00:24 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 40:46 | 04:39 +00:09 | 40:06 +00:40 |
| Running 6 | 05:47 | 45:34 | 05:01 +00:46 | 44:45 +00:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 51:21 | 02:01 +00:08 | 49:46 +01:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:43 | 53:30 | 05:00 +00:43 | 51:47 +01:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:05 | 59:13 | 04:33 -00:28 | 56:47 +02:26 |
| Running 8 | 04:07 | 01:03:18 | 05:27 -01:20 | 01:01:20 +01:58 |
| Wall Balls | 06:22 | 01:07:25 | 05:44 +00:38 | 01:06:47 +00:38 |
| Roxzone | 04:47 | 01:18:27 | 05:56 -01:09 | 01:18:27 |
Scott Johnston had a commendable performance in the 2024 Dublin Hyrox event, with his overall rank placing him in the top 21% of athletes. In his age group (30-34), he secured a rank within the top 27%. His total running time was slightly slower than average, hinting towards a stronger focus on strength-based exercises in his training regimen. His fastest lap was clocked at 00:04:07.
Scott started the race with a faster pace, evident from his first run being 01:21 faster than average. However, as the race progressed, his pace slowed down compared to the average. This suggests that he might have started too fast, which could have led to fatigue and slower subsequent running segments. His strengths lie in strength-based exercises as evident by his faster than average performances in Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Sandbag Lunges. His transition times were also commendable, with Roxzone being faster than average.
Scott should consider the following strategies for better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bastian Marc | 2024 Hamburg | 01:18:37 | |
| Gohl Jesus Gustavo | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:17:59 | |
| phelan shane | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:18:22 | |
| Tragkos Nico | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:18:07 | |
| Schuhmann Björn | 2019 Hamburg | 01:18:22 | |
| Page Stuart | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:01 | |
| Bosch Hidde | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:18:26 | |
| Rusenas Viktor | 2023 Chicago | 01:18:33 | |
| Merli Mattia | 2024 Rimini | 01:18:45 | |
| Niemann Marc | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
