Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Cape Town using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Emms Shirley's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Emms Shirley's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Emms Shirley's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Emms Shirley's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:14 | 45:12 to 42:58 | 42.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:12 | 06:27 to 05:15 | 22.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:59 | 05:01 to 04:02 | 18.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:39 | 02:40 to 02:01 | 12.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:09 | 05:07 to 04:58 | 2.8% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 05:14 to 05:09 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:33 to 01:33 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Emms Shirley | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:39 | 00:00 | 04:59 +00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 05:39 | 05:01 -00:13 | 04:59 +00:40 |
| Running 2 | 05:14 | 10:27 | 05:16 -00:02 | 10:00 +00:27 |
| Sled Push | 01:33 | 15:41 | 02:36 -01:03 | 15:16 +00:25 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 17:14 | 05:32 +00:00 | 17:52 -00:38 |
| Sled Pull | 05:07 | 22:46 | 05:25 -00:18 | 23:24 -00:38 |
| Running 4 | 05:37 | 27:53 | 05:34 +00:03 | 28:49 -00:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:27 | 33:30 | 05:40 +00:47 | 34:23 -00:53 |
| Running 5 | 05:57 | 39:57 | 05:41 +00:16 | 40:03 -00:06 |
| Rowing | 05:14 | 45:54 | 05:16 -00:02 | 45:44 +00:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 51:08 | 05:35 +00:14 | 51:00 +00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:40 | 56:57 | 02:10 +00:30 | 56:35 +00:22 |
| Running 7 | 05:41 | 59:37 | 05:34 +00:07 | 58:45 +00:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:10 | 01:05:18 | 04:29 -00:19 | 01:04:19 +00:59 |
| Running 8 | 05:47 | 01:09:28 | 05:57 -00:10 | 01:08:48 +00:40 |
| Wall Balls | 05:01 | 01:15:15 | 04:34 +00:27 | 01:14:45 +00:30 |
| Roxzone | 05:35 | 01:25:43 | 06:24 -00:49 | 01:25:43 |
Shirley Emms delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Cape Town Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 41, placing in the top 10% of all athletes, and a 9th place in her age group. Her performance demonstrates a strong capability in both endurance and strength events. Notably, her sled push time was particularly outstanding, ranking in the top 1 percentile. However, her total running time was 28 seconds slower than average, indicating room for improvement in running efficiency. Analyzing the pacing from Running 1 to Running 4, there's evidence that Shirley started slower than average and gradually improved, suggesting a conservative start that could be optimized. Overall, Shirley exhibits a hybrid profile, with strengths in strength-based activities but with some potential to enhance her running capacity.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Russo Natalie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:56 | |
| Norris Victoria | 2023 Manchester | 01:25:48 | |
| Popa Monica | 2019 Wien | 01:25:40 | |
| Bosi Elisa | 2024 Rimini | 01:25:48 | |
| Harris Annabel | 2022 London | 01:25:42 | |
| Andrewes Nataša | 2024 London | 01:25:30 | |
| Richard Melodie | 2024 Marseille | 01:25:14 | |
| Iezzi Lara | 2023 Milan | 01:25:31 | |
| Toothill Anna | 2024 Bilbao | 01:25:49 | |
| Cox Stephanie | 2023 Birmingham | 01:25:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
