Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Darby Rachel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Darby Rachel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Darby Rachel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Darby Rachel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:18 | 52:18 to 48:00 | 62.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:34 | 06:45 to 05:11 | 22.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 02:39 to 02:17 | 5.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:19 | 06:15 to 05:56 | 4.6% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:47 to 05:28 | 4.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:35 to 02:35 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Darby Rachel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:25 | 00:00 | 05:26 -02:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 03:25 | 05:15 -00:28 | 05:26 -02:01 |
| Running 2 | 05:52 | 08:12 | 05:47 +00:05 | 10:41 -02:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 14:04 | 02:57 -00:22 | 16:28 -02:24 |
| Running 3 | 06:17 | 16:39 | 06:06 +00:11 | 19:25 -02:46 |
| Sled Pull | 06:15 | 22:56 | 06:15 +00:00 | 25:31 -02:35 |
| Running 4 | 06:35 | 29:11 | 06:08 +00:27 | 31:46 -02:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:38 | 35:46 | 06:54 -02:16 | 37:54 -02:08 |
| Running 5 | 06:54 | 40:24 | 06:18 +00:36 | 44:48 -04:24 |
| Rowing | 05:47 | 47:18 | 05:32 +00:15 | 51:06 -03:48 |
| Running 6 | 06:45 | 53:05 | 06:10 +00:35 | 56:38 -03:33 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:39 | 59:50 | 02:25 +00:14 | 01:02:48 -02:58 |
| Running 7 | 07:21 | 01:02:29 | 06:09 +01:12 | 01:05:13 -02:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:36 | 01:09:50 | 05:15 -00:39 | 01:11:22 -01:32 |
| Running 8 | 09:12 | 01:14:26 | 06:44 +02:28 | 01:16:37 -02:11 |
| Wall Balls | 06:45 | 01:23:38 | 05:32 +01:13 | 01:23:21 +00:17 |
| Roxzone | 06:18 | 01:36:32 | 07:39 -01:21 | 01:36:32 |
Rachel Darby delivered a strong performance in the 2024 Dublin Hyrox race, ranking in the top 19% of all athletes and the top 15% of her age group. Despite a slower total running time compared to the average (03:09 slower), Rachel demonstrated exceptional strength on the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Burpees Broad Jump. Her best running lap was timed at 00:05:52, indicating an impressive running speed at certain points of the race. However, a closer analysis shows that Rachel may have started the race too fast, with running 1 timed at 01:57 faster than average, and then progressively slower times in the subsequent runs. This suggests a need for better pacing strategies to ensure consistent performance throughout the race.
Rachel should consider implementing the following race strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Blowes Leah | 2022 New York | 01:36:37 | |
| Dahncke Stefanie | 2018 Hamburg | 01:36:51 | |
| Grieger Nicole | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:36:23 | |
| Moreno Melanie | 2024 Dallas | 01:36:41 | |
| Shea Stephanie | 2022 Manchester | 01:36:51 | |
| Fung Sin Yee | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:36:46 | |
| Rambouoi Djamilah | 2023 Paris | 01:36:45 | |
| Schubert Daniela | 2023 Hamburg | 01:36:50 | |
| Graham Sonya | 2024 Brisbane | 01:36:11 | |
| Fahey Catherine | 2023 Birmingham | 01:36:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
