Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 972 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dahncke Stefanie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dahncke Stefanie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dahncke Stefanie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dahncke Stefanie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:27 | 52:38 to 48:11 | 72.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:44 | 08:20 to 06:36 | 28.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:38 to 05:38 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Dahncke Stefanie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:05 | 00:00 | 05:25 -00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:10 | 05:05 | 05:14 -00:04 | 05:25 -00:20 |
| Running 2 | 06:11 | 10:15 | 05:48 +00:23 | 10:39 -00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 16:26 | 02:56 -00:43 | 16:27 -00:01 |
| Running 3 | 06:37 | 18:39 | 06:07 +00:30 | 19:23 -00:44 |
| Sled Pull | 05:38 | 25:16 | 06:16 -00:38 | 25:30 -00:14 |
| Running 4 | 06:46 | 30:54 | 06:10 +00:36 | 31:46 -00:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:20 | 37:40 | 06:53 +01:27 | 37:56 -00:16 |
| Running 5 | 06:36 | 46:00 | 06:21 +00:15 | 44:49 +01:11 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 52:36 | 05:32 -00:32 | 51:10 +01:26 |
| Running 6 | 06:48 | 57:36 | 06:13 +00:35 | 56:42 +00:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 01:04:24 | 02:25 -00:34 | 01:02:55 +01:29 |
| Running 7 | 06:53 | 01:06:15 | 06:12 +00:41 | 01:05:20 +00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:44 | 01:13:08 | 05:17 -00:33 | 01:11:32 +01:36 |
| Running 8 | 07:44 | 01:17:52 | 06:47 +00:57 | 01:16:49 +01:03 |
| Wall Balls | 04:22 | 01:25:36 | 05:33 -01:11 | 01:23:36 +02:00 |
| Roxzone | 06:53 | 01:36:51 | 07:42 -00:49 | 01:36:51 |
Based on the splits analysis, Stefanie performed particularly well in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, with times 00:02 and 01:08 faster than the average, respectively. However, she struggled in several running segments, with times ranging from 00:14 to 00:40 slower than the average. Her total running time was also slower than the average, indicating a potential need for improvement in her running performance. Overall, Stefanie's profile appears to be more strength-focused rather than running-focused.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific training techniques and exercises, Stefanie can improve her performance in the HYROX race and continue to excel in her age group category.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Darias Delgado Maria Elena | 2022 Madrid | 01:37:07 | |
| Tindale Lauren | 2024 Incheon | 01:36:38 | |
| Vicari Annamaria | 2024 Dallas | 01:37:15 | |
| Zhang Phoebe | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:37:07 | |
| Tate Christine | 2024 Dublin | 01:36:37 | |
| Fehr Ivana | 2024 Hamburg | 01:37:17 | |
| Harsch Juliane | 2022 Leipzig | 01:36:56 | |
| Mchugh Niamh | 2023 Glasgow | 01:36:26 | |
| Jurkiewicz Tamara | 2023 Chicago | 01:36:51 | |
| Williams Jessica | 2023 Dallas | 01:36:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Hamburg | 01:34:42 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
