Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clarke Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clarke Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clarke Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clarke Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:30 | 08:00 to 06:30 | 37.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:12 | 06:36 to 05:24 | 29.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 05:34 to 04:57 | 15.4% |
| Run Total | 00:27 | 43:49 to 43:22 | 11.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:13 | 05:22 to 05:09 | 5.4% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:51 to 04:50 | 0.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:11 to 02:10 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:36 to 02:36 | 0.0% |
| Clarke Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:26 | 00:00 | 04:47 -01:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:07 | 03:26 | 04:30 -00:23 | 04:47 -01:21 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 07:33 | 05:07 +00:25 | 09:17 -01:44 |
| Sled Push | 02:36 | 13:05 | 03:03 -00:27 | 14:24 -01:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:42 | 15:41 | 05:36 +00:06 | 17:27 -01:46 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 21:23 | 05:12 +00:22 | 23:03 -01:40 |
| Running 4 | 05:52 | 26:57 | 05:35 +00:17 | 28:15 -01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:36 | 32:49 | 05:41 +00:55 | 33:50 -01:01 |
| Running 5 | 06:06 | 39:25 | 05:46 +00:20 | 39:31 -00:06 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 45:31 | 04:54 -00:03 | 45:17 +00:14 |
| Running 6 | 06:07 | 50:22 | 05:36 +00:31 | 50:11 +00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 56:29 | 02:17 -00:06 | 55:47 +00:42 |
| Running 7 | 06:11 | 58:40 | 05:35 +00:36 | 58:04 +00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:22 | 01:04:51 | 05:25 -00:03 | 01:03:39 +01:12 |
| Running 8 | 04:56 | 01:10:13 | 06:17 -01:21 | 01:09:04 +01:09 |
| Wall Balls | 08:00 | 01:15:09 | 06:55 +01:05 | 01:15:21 -00:12 |
| Roxzone | 06:33 | 01:29:33 | 07:17 -00:44 | 01:29:33 |
Paul Clarke demonstrated commendable performance in the 2024 Dublin Hyrox event. His overall rank places him in the top 42% of all athletes and an impressive top 19% in his age group. His total running time was notably faster than the average, suggesting a strong runner's profile. Paul's pacing in the race reveals an interesting trend. His speed in the early stages of the race, particularly during Running 1 and Running 2, was significantly faster than average. However, in the latter stages, from Running 4 to Running 7, his pace was slower than the average. This suggests that he may have started too fast, thus affecting his endurance in the later stages of the race.
The following segments have been identified for improvement based on their slower than average completion times:
Paul's performance analysis suggests that he may benefit from modifying his race strategy. Here are some specific strategies that he can consider:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Teo Keefe | 2024 Milan | 01:29:33 | |
| Nagl Bernhard | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:29:54 | |
| Metcalfe Adam | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:31 | |
| Burke Odelle | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:30:02 | |
| Vigotti Giacomo | 2024 Rimini | 01:29:44 | |
| Thierry Leroy | 2023 Barcelona | 01:29:26 | |
| Feeney Michael | 2024 Malaga | 01:30:02 | |
| Innes Paul | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:21 | |
| Vymetalik Michal | 2021 Birmingham | 01:29:48 | |
| Lau Marcus | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:29:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Dublin | 01:37:12 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
