Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Calabro Sandro's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Calabro Sandro's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Calabro Sandro's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Calabro Sandro's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:55 | 40:13 to 38:18 | 45.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:00 | 06:14 to 05:14 | 23.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:39 | 04:43 to 04:04 | 15.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:18 | 04:32 to 04:14 | 7.1% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:42 to 04:32 | 4.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 02:31 to 02:22 | 3.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 01:50 to 01:49 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Calabro Sandro | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:57 | 00:00 | 04:19 -01:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 02:57 | 04:20 -00:09 | 04:19 -01:22 |
| Running 2 | 04:43 | 07:08 | 04:38 +00:05 | 08:39 -01:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 11:51 | 02:40 -00:09 | 13:17 -01:26 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 14:22 | 05:00 +00:05 | 15:57 -01:35 |
| Sled Pull | 04:43 | 19:27 | 04:27 +00:16 | 20:57 -01:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:00 | 24:10 | 04:59 +00:01 | 25:24 -01:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:32 | 29:10 | 04:39 -00:07 | 30:23 -01:13 |
| Running 5 | 05:30 | 33:42 | 05:08 +00:22 | 35:02 -01:20 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 39:12 | 04:39 +00:03 | 40:10 -00:58 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 43:54 | 05:01 +00:19 | 44:49 -00:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 49:14 | 02:01 -00:11 | 49:50 -00:36 |
| Running 7 | 05:35 | 51:04 | 05:00 +00:35 | 51:51 -00:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:05 | 56:39 | 04:35 -00:30 | 56:51 -00:12 |
| Running 8 | 06:06 | 01:00:44 | 05:27 +00:39 | 01:01:26 -00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 06:14 | 01:06:50 | 05:46 +00:28 | 01:06:53 -00:03 |
| Roxzone | 05:40 | 01:18:36 | 05:57 -00:17 | 01:18:36 |
Sandro Calabro delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, placing in the top 19% of all athletes and top 21% in his age group. His overall time of 01:18:36 reflects a solid mix of endurance and strength, with particular strengths in the initial running segment and several strength exercises such as the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Farmers Carry. However, his total running time was 00:15 slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in running efficiency. Sandro's pacing suggests he started strong but struggled to maintain this speed throughout the race, possibly due to fatigue from strength exercises. His performance profile indicates a hybrid athlete, with potential to enhance both running and strength aspects.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sheratte Dom | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:06 | |
| Russell Alan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:18:57 | |
| Martínez Valero Juan Fernando | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:18:59 | |
| White James | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:22 | |
| Bröring Christian | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:18:23 | |
| Li Pak Ho | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:18:26 | |
| Walker Jack | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:12 | |
| Van Asch Damian | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:18 | |
| Thomas Jackson | 2024 Sydney | 01:19:03 | |
| van Harberden Sven | 2022 Maastricht | 01:18:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
