Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 19 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Watters Jennifer's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Watters Jennifer's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Watters Jennifer's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Watters Jennifer's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 30:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 11:20 | 01:15:24 to 01:04:04 | 37.3% |
| Wall Balls | 09:19 | 18:41 to 09:22 | 30.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:07 | 14:03 to 07:56 | 20.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:46 | 13:46 to 11:00 | 9.1% |
| Rowing | 00:42 | 07:06 to 06:24 | 2.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 03:29 to 03:22 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 05:58 to 05:57 | 0.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:59 to 02:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 08:52 to 08:52 | 0.0% |
| Watters Jennifer | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 08:10 | 00:00 | 08:14 -00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:58 | 08:10 | 05:49 +00:09 | 08:14 -00:04 |
| Running 2 | 07:31 | 14:08 | 08:47 -01:16 | 14:03 +00:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:59 | 21:39 | 03:54 -00:55 | 22:50 -01:11 |
| Running 3 | 08:36 | 24:38 | 09:32 -00:56 | 26:44 -02:06 |
| Sled Pull | 08:52 | 33:14 | 09:41 -00:49 | 36:16 -03:02 |
| Running 4 | 08:39 | 42:06 | 10:35 -01:56 | 45:57 -03:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 13:46 | 50:45 | 16:53 -03:07 | 56:32 -05:47 |
| Running 5 | 11:08 | 01:04:31 | 11:00 +00:08 | 01:13:25 -08:54 |
| Rowing | 07:06 | 01:15:39 | 06:27 +00:39 | 01:24:25 -08:46 |
| Running 6 | 09:13 | 01:22:45 | 10:35 -01:22 | 01:30:52 -08:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:29 | 01:31:58 | 03:08 +00:21 | 01:41:27 -09:29 |
| Running 7 | 09:24 | 01:35:27 | 10:56 -01:32 | 01:44:35 -09:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 14:03 | 01:44:51 | 11:50 +02:13 | 01:55:31 -10:40 |
| Running 8 | 12:47 | 01:58:54 | 12:35 +00:12 | 02:07:21 -08:27 |
| Wall Balls | 18:41 | 02:11:41 | 12:19 +06:22 | 02:19:56 -08:15 |
| Roxzone | 14:20 | 02:44:33 | 12:18 +02:02 | 02:44:33 |
Jennifer Watters showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race, ranking in the top 34% of both her age group and overall participants. A particular highlight of her performance was her total running time. Excelling in this area, she finished 05:42 faster than the average athlete, which indicates a strong inclination towards running-based activities.
Her performance in the initial running segments, from running 1 to running 4, suggests a well-paced start. However, there is room for improvement as the race progressed, with a slightly slower pace in the later running segments. This could be due to fatigue setting in, which could be addressed with endurance training.
For better performance in future races, Jennifer should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ocaña Camila | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:44:42 | |
| Ryan Helen | 2024 Manchester | 02:45:01 | |
| Fazzari Lauren | 2024 New York | 02:44:22 | |
| Lander Claudia | 2024 Madrid | 02:44:20 | |
| Lopez Luz | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:44:39 | |
| Summan Anita | 2024 Birmingham | 02:45:03 | |
| Daim Norisa | 2024 Singapore | 02:44:33 | |
| Jones Shona | 2023 London | 02:45:03 | |
| Scaia Connie | 2024 Dallas | 02:44:59 | |
| Read Jessica | 2024 Birmingham | 02:44:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Stockholm | 02:24:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
