Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wagenaar Thijs's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wagenaar Thijs's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wagenaar Thijs's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wagenaar Thijs's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:01 | 47:41 to 42:40 | 89.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:37 | 05:38 to 05:01 | 10.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:37 to 03:37 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:06 to 06:06 | 0.0% |
| Wagenaar Thijs | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:20 | 00:00 | 04:41 -01:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 03:20 | 04:29 -00:11 | 04:41 -01:21 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 07:38 | 05:04 +00:14 | 09:10 -01:32 |
| Sled Push | 02:03 | 12:56 | 02:59 -00:56 | 14:14 -01:18 |
| Running 3 | 06:11 | 14:59 | 05:32 +00:39 | 17:13 -02:14 |
| Sled Pull | 03:37 | 21:10 | 05:04 -01:27 | 22:45 -01:35 |
| Running 4 | 06:10 | 24:47 | 05:30 +00:40 | 27:49 -03:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:05 | 30:57 | 05:34 -00:29 | 33:19 -02:22 |
| Running 5 | 06:26 | 36:02 | 05:41 +00:45 | 38:53 -02:51 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 42:28 | 04:52 -00:28 | 44:34 -02:06 |
| Running 6 | 06:42 | 46:52 | 05:32 +01:10 | 49:26 -02:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 53:34 | 02:14 -00:12 | 54:58 -01:24 |
| Running 7 | 06:33 | 55:36 | 05:31 +01:02 | 57:12 -01:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:38 | 01:02:09 | 05:17 +00:21 | 01:02:43 -00:34 |
| Running 8 | 07:05 | 01:07:47 | 06:09 +00:56 | 01:08:00 -00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 06:06 | 01:14:52 | 06:46 -00:40 | 01:14:09 +00:43 |
| Roxzone | 07:12 | 01:28:01 | 07:06 +00:06 | 01:28:01 |
Thijs Wagenaar's overall performance in the HYROX 2024 Amsterdam event showcased his strength and endurance. Thijs finished in the top 36% of all participants and in the top 34% of his age group, a commendable achievement. However, his total running time was notably slower than the average, indicating that Thijs may be a more strength-focused athlete. His fastest lap time was 00:05:18, which is impressive but indicates room for improvement in running segments. Thijs started the race faster than average, as seen in the Running 1 split, but gradually lost pace in the subsequent running segments. This suggests that Thijs may need to work on his pacing strategy to maintain consistent speed throughout the race.
Implementing the following strategies can help Thijs improve his performance in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Te Braak Cas | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:27:52 | |
| Kraaijeveld Peter | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:38 | |
| Hernandez Lucas | 2020 Chicago | 01:27:59 | |
| Flynn Josh | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:16 | |
| Serfass Trevor | 2024 Dallas | 01:28:05 | |
| Verkerk Jeroen | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:19 | |
| Mcbroom Sam | 2024 London | 01:28:27 | |
| Huth Friedrich | 2023 Hamburg | 01:27:58 | |
| Dunning Paul | 2024 Glasgow | 01:28:05 | |
| Gibney Kevin | 2022 London | 01:27:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
