Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Der Toorn Jimmy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Der Toorn Jimmy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Der Toorn Jimmy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Der Toorn Jimmy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:21 | 54:05 to 47:44 | 88.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:26 | 03:48 to 03:22 | 6.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 02:51 to 02:29 | 5.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:45 to 05:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:44 to 05:44 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:07 to 07:07 | 0.0% |
| Van Der Toorn Jimmy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:23 | 00:00 | 05:08 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 04:23 | 04:40 -00:17 | 05:08 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 06:11 | 08:46 | 05:36 +00:35 | 09:48 -01:02 |
| Sled Push | 03:48 | 14:57 | 03:25 +00:23 | 15:24 -00:27 |
| Running 3 | 06:46 | 18:45 | 06:07 +00:39 | 18:49 -00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:01 | 25:31 | 05:52 -00:51 | 24:56 +00:35 |
| Running 4 | 06:53 | 30:32 | 06:05 +00:48 | 30:48 -00:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:45 | 37:25 | 06:37 -00:52 | 36:53 +00:32 |
| Running 5 | 07:07 | 43:10 | 06:21 +00:46 | 43:30 -00:20 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 50:17 | 05:08 -00:12 | 49:51 +00:26 |
| Running 6 | 07:09 | 55:13 | 06:11 +00:58 | 54:59 +00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:51 | 01:02:22 | 02:32 +00:19 | 01:01:10 +01:12 |
| Running 7 | 07:14 | 01:05:13 | 06:09 +01:05 | 01:03:42 +01:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:44 | 01:12:27 | 06:14 -00:30 | 01:09:51 +02:36 |
| Running 8 | 08:25 | 01:18:11 | 07:09 +01:16 | 01:16:05 +02:06 |
| Wall Balls | 07:07 | 01:26:36 | 08:07 -01:00 | 01:23:14 +03:22 |
| Roxzone | 06:26 | 01:40:01 | 08:40 -02:14 | 01:40:01 |
In terms of his splits, Jimmy's best running lap was impressive, completing it in 00:04:23, which was 00:30 faster than the average. His ski erg performance was also strong, finishing in 00:04:23, which was 00:17 faster than the average. However, he struggled in the running segments, particularly Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, and Running 5, where he was consistently slower than the average.
Overall, Jimmy Van Der Toorn showed potential in the Hyrox race, with strong performances in certain segments. By targeting the areas for improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Evans Chris | 2023 Melbourne | 01:40:01 | |
| Whelan Eli | 2023 Dublin | 01:40:06 | |
| Simoes Stephen | 2024 Melbourne | 01:40:11 | |
| Seferagic Lukas | 2023 Wien | 01:39:31 | |
| Jozefiak Grzegorz | 2024 Katowice | 01:40:20 | |
| Walker Dan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:40:12 | |
| Ryan Michael | 2024 Dubai | 01:39:52 | |
| Thorbahn Jan | 2022 Hamburg | 01:40:11 | |
| Riesch Matthias | 2022 München | 01:40:09 | |
| Von Borstel Helge | 2020 Hannover | 01:39:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:37:29 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
