Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Feighney James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Feighney James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Feighney James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Feighney James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:41 | 46:32 to 42:51 | 56.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:59 | 07:21 to 06:22 | 15.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:54 | 03:44 to 02:50 | 13.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:24 | 02:31 to 02:07 | 6.1% |
| Rowing | 00:20 | 05:08 to 04:48 | 5.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 | 04:42 to 04:26 | 4.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Feighney James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:14 | 00:00 | 04:42 -01:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 03:14 | 04:29 +00:13 | 04:42 -01:28 |
| Running 2 | 05:29 | 07:56 | 05:05 +00:24 | 09:11 -01:15 |
| Sled Push | 03:44 | 13:25 | 02:59 +00:45 | 14:16 -00:51 |
| Running 3 | 06:33 | 17:09 | 05:33 +01:00 | 17:15 -00:06 |
| Sled Pull | 04:30 | 23:42 | 05:05 -00:35 | 22:48 +00:54 |
| Running 4 | 06:03 | 28:12 | 05:32 +00:31 | 27:53 +00:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:02 | 34:15 | 05:34 -01:32 | 33:25 +00:50 |
| Running 5 | 06:18 | 38:17 | 05:42 +00:36 | 38:59 -00:42 |
| Rowing | 05:08 | 44:35 | 04:52 +00:16 | 44:41 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 06:10 | 49:43 | 05:34 +00:36 | 49:33 +00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:31 | 55:53 | 02:15 +00:16 | 55:07 +00:46 |
| Running 7 | 06:21 | 58:24 | 05:33 +00:48 | 57:22 +01:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:56 | 01:04:45 | 05:20 -00:24 | 01:02:55 +01:50 |
| Running 8 | 06:27 | 01:09:41 | 06:12 +00:15 | 01:08:15 +01:26 |
| Wall Balls | 07:21 | 01:16:08 | 06:47 +00:34 | 01:14:27 +01:41 |
| Roxzone | 04:58 | 01:28:19 | 07:05 -02:07 | 01:28:19 |
It is worth noting that James' total running time of 00:46:32 was 04:25 slower than the average time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and his transition time between exercise zones (roxzone). Additionally, his best running lap time was 00:03:14, which was 01:18 faster than average. This suggests that James has a strong running profile and should continue to train his running abilities.
In conclusion, James Feighney had a strong performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can make improvements. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, transitioning time, and specific training strategies for the identified segments, James can enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Smith Doug | 2024 Dallas | 01:28:12 | |
| Seefeld Kai | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:28:38 | |
| Ives Chris | 2023 London | 01:28:17 | |
| Raimundo Joao Tiago | 2023 Madrid | 01:28:32 | |
| Snape Mark | 2023 Dublin | 01:28:41 | |
| Mcgourty Derek | 2022 Birmingham | 01:27:59 | |
| Lebouef Cody | 2024 Dallas | 01:28:39 | |
| Chua Books | 2024 Singapore | 01:28:30 | |
| Rice Oisin | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:28:27 | |
| Carey Simon | 2024 Dublin | 01:28:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Stockholm | 01:21:06 | |
| 2023 Malmö | 01:28:45 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:36:07 | |
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:37:16 | |
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:30:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
