Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Verberkt Luc's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Verberkt Luc's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Verberkt Luc's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Verberkt Luc's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:43 | 50:14 to 46:31 | 70.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:45 | 06:16 to 05:31 | 14.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:20 | 03:34 to 03:14 | 6.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:51 to 04:37 | 4.4% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 05:15 to 05:01 | 4.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:00 to 06:00 | 0.0% |
| Verberkt Luc | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:03 | 00:00 | 05:00 -00:57 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:51 | 04:03 | 04:38 +00:13 | 05:00 -00:57 |
| Running 2 | 05:59 | 08:54 | 05:27 +00:32 | 09:38 -00:44 |
| Sled Push | 03:34 | 14:53 | 03:18 +00:16 | 15:05 -00:12 |
| Running 3 | 06:23 | 18:27 | 05:58 +00:25 | 18:23 +00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 06:16 | 24:50 | 05:41 +00:35 | 24:21 +00:29 |
| Running 4 | 06:42 | 31:06 | 05:57 +00:45 | 30:02 +01:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:12 | 37:48 | 06:24 -01:12 | 35:59 +01:49 |
| Running 5 | 06:52 | 43:00 | 06:13 +00:39 | 42:23 +00:37 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 49:52 | 05:04 +00:11 | 48:36 +01:16 |
| Running 6 | 06:16 | 55:07 | 06:01 +00:15 | 53:40 +01:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 01:01:23 | 02:26 -00:12 | 59:41 +01:42 |
| Running 7 | 06:20 | 01:03:37 | 06:01 +00:19 | 01:02:07 +01:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:18 | 01:09:57 | 05:59 -00:41 | 01:08:08 +01:49 |
| Running 8 | 07:42 | 01:15:15 | 06:59 +00:43 | 01:14:07 +01:08 |
| Wall Balls | 06:00 | 01:22:57 | 07:49 -01:49 | 01:21:06 +01:51 |
| Roxzone | 08:21 | 01:37:11 | 08:16 +00:05 | 01:37:11 |
Pacing and Profile:
Luc's total running time of 00:50:14 is 04:23 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he may need to work on his overall fitness and transition time to improve his performance in the roxzone. Additionally, his splits analysis shows that he lost time in several running segments, including Running 4, Running 5, Running 2, and Running 8. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his running ability.
Incorporating these strategies into his training and race plan can help Luc Verberkt improve his performance in future Hyrox races. By focusing on his running ability, improving his overall fitness, and optimizing his race strategies, he can achieve better results and continue to progress as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hötzer Danilo | 2022 Maastricht | 01:37:16 | |
| Van Den Oetelaar Rick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:36:44 | |
| Szott Marcin | 2024 Katowice | 01:36:52 | |
| Greenhouse Anthony | 2024 Manchester | 01:37:07 | |
| Treichel Dennis | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:37:23 | |
| Laurijssen Kjelt | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:37:27 | |
| Calarese Francesco | 2024 Turin | 01:36:47 | |
| Tan Augustine | 2024 Incheon | 01:36:47 | |
| Martos Jose | 2024 Malaga | 01:36:50 | |
| Radu Buda | 2023 Valencia | 01:36:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:21:02 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
