Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 247 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Seichter Cameron's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Seichter Cameron's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Seichter Cameron's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Seichter Cameron's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:47 | 33:03 to 31:16 | 64.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 02:48 to 02:23 | 15.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:04 to 03:49 | 9.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 01:41 to 01:32 | 5.5% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:10 to 04:05 | 3.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 03:29 to 03:25 | 2.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Seichter Cameron | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:04 | 00:00 | 03:29 -00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 03:04 | 03:55 +00:09 | 03:29 -00:25 |
| Running 2 | 04:01 | 07:08 | 03:46 +00:15 | 07:24 -00:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 11:09 | 02:54 -00:06 | 11:10 -00:01 |
| Running 3 | 04:11 | 13:57 | 04:01 +00:10 | 14:04 -00:07 |
| Sled Pull | 03:31 | 18:08 | 04:15 -00:44 | 18:05 +00:03 |
| Running 4 | 04:18 | 21:39 | 04:03 +00:15 | 22:20 -00:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:18 | 25:57 | 03:00 -00:42 | 26:23 -00:26 |
| Running 5 | 04:28 | 28:15 | 04:08 +00:20 | 29:23 -01:08 |
| Rowing | 04:10 | 32:43 | 04:09 +00:01 | 33:31 -00:48 |
| Running 6 | 04:14 | 36:53 | 04:04 +00:10 | 37:40 -00:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 41:07 | 01:41 +00:00 | 41:44 -00:37 |
| Running 7 | 04:18 | 42:48 | 04:06 +00:12 | 43:25 -00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:29 | 47:06 | 03:41 -00:12 | 47:31 -00:25 |
| Running 8 | 04:31 | 50:35 | 04:21 +00:10 | 51:12 -00:37 |
| Wall Balls | 03:59 | 55:06 | 04:48 -00:49 | 55:33 -00:27 |
| Roxzone | 05:24 | 01:04:23 | 04:02 +01:22 | 01:04:23 |
Overall, Cameron Seichter demonstrated a strong performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event. He placed in the top 4% of all athletes and top 5% in his age group, a remarkable achievement. His strength-based exercises, such as the Sled Pull and Burpees Broad Jump, were areas of particular strength, with times considerably faster than average. However, Cameron's running time was slower than average, indicating a focus on strength over endurance in his training. Interestingly, his first running segment was significantly faster than average, suggesting an overly quick start and potential pacing issues.
To manage his race more effectively, Cameron should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hertig Savo | 2024 Köln | 01:04:21 | |
| Schwartz Cole | 2021 Los Angeles | 01:04:49 | |
| Pranjic Ivan | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:04:14 | |
| Grewe Patrick | 2022 München | 01:04:13 | |
| Bergsman Pär | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:03:59 | |
| Perségol Robin | 2022 Dallas | 01:04:27 | |
| Mc Gowan Shane | 2023 Milan | 01:04:37 | |
| Galloway Evan | 2024 Manchester | 01:04:07 | |
| Decicco Jimmy | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:04:37 | |
| Kotte Loris | 2024 Gdansk | 01:04:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:06:57 | |
| 2023 Chicago | 01:05:04 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
