Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gilmour Steven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gilmour Steven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gilmour Steven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gilmour Steven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:26 | 06:30 to 04:04 | 34.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:00 | 06:14 to 04:14 | 28.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:07 | 06:21 to 05:14 | 15.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:48 | 03:10 to 02:22 | 11.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 02:08 to 01:49 | 4.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:26 to 04:13 | 3.1% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 04:45 to 04:32 | 3.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:54 to 03:54 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 35:11 to 35:11 | 0.0% |
| Gilmour Steven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:44 | 00:00 | 04:19 +00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 04:44 | 04:20 +00:06 | 04:19 +00:25 |
| Running 2 | 04:05 | 09:10 | 04:38 -00:33 | 08:39 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 03:10 | 13:15 | 02:40 +00:30 | 13:17 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 04:16 | 16:25 | 05:00 -00:44 | 15:57 +00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 06:30 | 20:41 | 04:27 +02:03 | 20:57 -00:16 |
| Running 4 | 04:27 | 27:11 | 04:59 -00:32 | 25:24 +01:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:14 | 31:38 | 04:39 +01:35 | 30:23 +01:15 |
| Running 5 | 04:33 | 37:52 | 05:08 -00:35 | 35:02 +02:50 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 42:25 | 04:39 +00:06 | 40:10 +02:15 |
| Running 6 | 04:22 | 47:10 | 05:01 -00:39 | 44:49 +02:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 51:32 | 02:01 +00:07 | 49:50 +01:42 |
| Running 7 | 04:17 | 53:40 | 05:00 -00:43 | 51:51 +01:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:54 | 57:57 | 04:35 -00:41 | 56:51 +01:06 |
| Running 8 | 04:30 | 01:01:51 | 05:26 -00:56 | 01:01:26 +00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 06:21 | 01:06:21 | 05:46 +00:35 | 01:06:52 -00:31 |
| Roxzone | 05:59 | 01:18:34 | 05:56 +00:03 | 01:18:34 |
Steven Gilmour exhibited a strong performance overall in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, ranking in the top 19% of 4107 athletes. Notably, his total running time was 04:37 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, the initial segments of the race show that he started relatively slowly with his Running 1 being 00:24 slower than average, indicating a cautious start. This strategy of preserving energy in the initial stages seems to have paid off, as he was able to finish strong in the later segments, demonstrating a well-executed pacing strategy.
Given Steven's evident strengths in running, he should continue to leverage this advantage by maintaining a steady pace throughout the race, while conserving enough energy for the strength-based segments. He should focus on improving his transition times in the roxzone by practicing quick and efficient transitions. Also, incorporating a dynamic warm-up before the race could help prepare his muscles for the varied demands of the race. Lastly, he should focus on maintaining proper form during fatigue, as this can help prevent injuries and improve efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jenkins Charles | 2022 Basel | 01:18:30 | |
| Vermeulen Jeroen | 2024 Berlin | 01:18:06 | |
| Kozowski Dawid | 2024 Gdansk | 01:18:57 | |
| Stansell Andrew | 2024 Dublin | 01:18:43 | |
| Herrera Diego | 2023 Barcelona | 01:18:46 | |
| Guerrero Contreras Antonio Jose | 2023 Madrid | 01:19:04 | |
| Höft Corvin | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:18:25 | |
| Darling Andy | 2024 Glasgow | 01:18:05 | |
| Jeffery Thomas | 2022 London | 01:18:48 | |
| Weiland German | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:18:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
