Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 568 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Connolly Megan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Connolly Megan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Connolly Megan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Connolly Megan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:17 | 04:35 to 03:18 | 52.0% |
| Run Total | 01:11 | 54:24 to 53:13 | 48.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:51 to 05:51 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:04 to 07:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:47 to 05:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:36 to 02:36 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:51 to 05:51 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:08 to 06:08 | 0.0% |
| Connolly Megan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:33 | 00:00 | 05:45 -02:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:14 | 03:33 | 05:27 -00:13 | 05:45 -02:12 |
| Running 2 | 06:06 | 08:47 | 06:23 -00:17 | 11:12 -02:25 |
| Sled Push | 04:35 | 14:53 | 03:19 +01:16 | 17:35 -02:42 |
| Running 3 | 07:55 | 19:28 | 06:48 +01:07 | 20:54 -01:26 |
| Sled Pull | 05:51 | 27:23 | 07:05 -01:14 | 27:42 -00:19 |
| Running 4 | 06:53 | 33:14 | 06:51 +00:02 | 34:47 -01:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:04 | 40:07 | 08:17 -01:13 | 41:38 -01:31 |
| Running 5 | 07:29 | 47:11 | 07:08 +00:21 | 49:55 -02:44 |
| Rowing | 05:47 | 54:40 | 05:48 -00:01 | 57:03 -02:23 |
| Running 6 | 06:33 | 01:00:27 | 06:58 -00:25 | 01:02:51 -02:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:36 | 01:07:00 | 02:37 -00:01 | 01:09:49 -02:49 |
| Running 7 | 07:14 | 01:09:36 | 06:59 +00:15 | 01:12:26 -02:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:51 | 01:16:50 | 06:12 -00:21 | 01:19:25 -02:35 |
| Running 8 | 08:45 | 01:22:41 | 07:50 +00:55 | 01:25:37 -02:56 |
| Wall Balls | 06:08 | 01:31:26 | 06:37 -00:29 | 01:33:27 -02:01 |
| Roxzone | 11:36 | 01:49:03 | 08:59 +02:37 | 01:49:03 |
Megan Connolly showcased an impressive performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event, finishing in the top 34% of 1404 athletes and the top 41% of her age group. Her overall time was 01:49:03, with a total running time of 00:54:24, which was 46 seconds faster than the average. Megan's strongest segment was running, with her best lap being a swift 00:06:06. However, her performance in the Roxzone and strength segments such as the Sled Push could use some improvement.
Regarding pacing, Megan started the race strong, with her Running 1 time being 02:07 faster than the average. This hints at a possible tendency to start the race at a fast pace. With regards to her profile, Megan appears to be more of a runner, given her superior running times compared to the average. However, she also demonstrated commendable strength in some segments such as the Sled Pull and Burpees Broad Jump. Hence, Megan appears to have a hybrid profile with a slight inclination towards running.
Megan could consider the following strategies for better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Villalobos Jules | 2021 Dallas | 01:48:52 | |
| Chomek Janine | 2021 Hamburg | 01:49:15 | |
| French Kathryn | 2022 Birmingham | 01:49:29 | |
| Capell Catelinn | 2024 Brisbane | 01:48:51 | |
| Enklaar Fabienne | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:48:54 | |
| Dunleavy Maria | 2023 Dublin | 01:48:38 | |
| Kwan Kimberly | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:49:32 | |
| Kashefpour Niloofar | 2021 Leipzig | 01:49:05 | |
| Welsh Amber | 2023 London | 01:48:53 | |
| Doyle Kay | 2023 Glasgow | 01:49:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
