Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Stamatis Nia's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Stamatis Nia's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Stamatis Nia's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stamatis Nia's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:30 | 53:01 to 45:31 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:55 to 01:55 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:41 to 03:41 | 0.0% |
| Stamatis Nia | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:14 | 00:00 | 05:10 -00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 04:14 | 05:08 -00:16 | 05:10 -00:56 |
| Running 2 | 06:10 | 09:06 | 05:31 +00:39 | 10:18 -01:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 15:16 | 02:46 -00:32 | 15:49 -00:33 |
| Running 3 | 06:21 | 17:30 | 05:51 +00:30 | 18:35 -01:05 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 23:51 | 05:51 -01:20 | 24:26 -00:35 |
| Running 4 | 06:35 | 28:22 | 05:52 +00:43 | 30:17 -01:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:41 | 34:57 | 06:13 -01:32 | 36:09 -01:12 |
| Running 5 | 07:00 | 39:38 | 06:00 +01:00 | 42:22 -02:44 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 46:38 | 05:25 -00:32 | 48:22 -01:44 |
| Running 6 | 07:26 | 51:31 | 05:54 +01:32 | 53:47 -02:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:55 | 58:57 | 02:16 -00:21 | 59:41 -00:44 |
| Running 7 | 07:45 | 01:00:52 | 05:52 +01:53 | 01:01:57 -01:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:06 | 01:08:37 | 04:53 -00:47 | 01:07:49 +00:48 |
| Running 8 | 07:33 | 01:12:43 | 06:17 +01:16 | 01:12:42 +00:01 |
| Wall Balls | 03:41 | 01:20:16 | 05:01 -01:20 | 01:18:59 +01:17 |
| Roxzone | 07:14 | 01:31:02 | 07:02 +00:12 | 01:31:02 |
Nia Stamatis delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 251, placing her in the top 24% of 1014 athletes. Within her age group, she ranked 68th, landing in the top 27% of competitors. Notably, Nia's strength-based segments demonstrated remarkable efficiency, consistently outperforming the average, which highlights her prowess in strength and hybrid exercises. However, her total running time was 5:55 slower than average, indicating an area needing improvement. Early running segments were executed at a fast pace, suggesting a potential pacing issue, as her later running segments showed significant slowdowns. This indicates that she may have started too fast and struggled to maintain her pace throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mccann Sharon | 2023 Glasgow | 01:31:01 | |
| Hibell Dominique | 2024 Poznan | 01:30:56 | |
| Varma Divya | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:30:44 | |
| Wille Lisa | 2023 München | 01:30:50 | |
| Eve Tracey | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:30:49 | |
| Desborough Joanne | 2023 London | 01:30:59 | |
| SyrokaPawelec Iwona | 2024 Poznan | 01:31:31 | |
| Lammerskitten Friederike | 2023 Hannover | 01:31:20 | |
| Trajkovich Ashley | 2023 New York | 01:31:12 | |
| Prescott Hannah | 2023 Singapore | 01:31:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:36:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
