Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hetherington Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hetherington Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hetherington Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hetherington Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:29 | 47:34 to 46:05 | 41.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:18 | 06:58 to 05:40 | 36.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:36 | 02:57 to 02:21 | 16.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:13 | 03:24 to 03:11 | 6.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:36 to 05:36 | 0.0% |
| Hetherington Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:43 | 00:00 | 04:58 -01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 03:43 | 04:36 -00:25 | 04:58 -01:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:24 | 07:54 | 05:23 +00:01 | 09:34 -01:40 |
| Sled Push | 03:24 | 13:18 | 03:13 +00:11 | 14:57 -01:39 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 16:42 | 05:52 -00:14 | 18:10 -01:28 |
| Sled Pull | 05:11 | 22:20 | 05:35 -00:24 | 24:02 -01:42 |
| Running 4 | 05:52 | 27:31 | 05:53 -00:01 | 29:37 -02:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:46 | 33:23 | 06:19 -01:33 | 35:30 -02:07 |
| Running 5 | 06:02 | 38:09 | 06:07 -00:05 | 41:49 -03:40 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 44:11 | 05:03 -00:07 | 47:56 -03:45 |
| Running 6 | 06:12 | 49:07 | 05:55 +00:17 | 52:59 -03:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:57 | 55:19 | 02:27 +00:30 | 58:54 -03:35 |
| Running 7 | 06:19 | 58:16 | 05:54 +00:25 | 01:01:21 -03:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:58 | 01:04:35 | 05:54 +01:04 | 01:07:15 -02:40 |
| Running 8 | 08:28 | 01:11:33 | 06:48 +01:40 | 01:13:09 -01:36 |
| Wall Balls | 05:36 | 01:20:01 | 07:41 -02:05 | 01:19:57 +00:04 |
| Roxzone | 10:18 | 01:35:47 | 08:09 +02:09 | 01:35:47 |
Matthew Hetherington delivered a solid performance in the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, finishing in the top 40% overall and top 44% within his age group. Despite a commendable start, Matthew's overall running time was 22 seconds slower than average, indicating potential for improvement in running endurance and pace consistency. His performance suggests a hybrid profile with strengths in both running and strength exercises, although there is room for improvement in his running efficiency and transition speeds. His initial running segments were notably faster than average, indicating he may have started too fast, which could have impacted his endurance in later segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dyer Matt | 2021 Birmingham | 01:35:52 | |
| Maxwell Paul | 2022 Birmingham | 01:36:01 | |
| Ang Kenneth | 2023 Singapore | 01:35:40 | |
| Hewitt Paul | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:36:13 | |
| Grimm Thomas | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:35:38 | |
| Slevin Peter | 2024 Glasgow | 01:35:28 | |
| Dewitt Alex | 2024 New York | 01:35:41 | |
| Mehmet Mehmet | 2024 Stockholm | 01:35:39 | |
| Jones Christian | 2021 New York | 01:35:17 | |
| Ferraro Frank | 2024 Melbourne | 01:35:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
