Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Frankfurt using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Weizel Andreas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Weizel Andreas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Weizel Andreas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Weizel Andreas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 02:07 | 05:18 to 03:11 | 83.6% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 05:12 to 04:59 | 8.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:47 to 04:35 | 7.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:51 to 05:51 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:54 to 06:54 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:47 to 45:47 | 0.0% |
| Weizel Andreas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:45 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 04:45 | 04:36 +00:11 | 04:58 -00:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:25 | 09:32 | 05:23 +00:02 | 09:34 -00:02 |
| Sled Push | 05:18 | 14:57 | 03:13 +02:05 | 14:57 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:41 | 20:15 | 05:52 -00:11 | 18:10 +02:05 |
| Sled Pull | 05:10 | 25:56 | 05:34 -00:24 | 24:02 +01:54 |
| Running 4 | 05:41 | 31:06 | 05:52 -00:11 | 29:36 +01:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:51 | 36:47 | 06:19 -00:28 | 35:28 +01:19 |
| Running 5 | 05:53 | 42:38 | 06:07 -00:14 | 41:47 +00:51 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 48:31 | 05:03 +00:09 | 47:54 +00:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:47 | 53:43 | 05:55 -00:08 | 52:57 +00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 59:30 | 02:27 -00:18 | 58:52 +00:38 |
| Running 7 | 05:46 | 01:01:39 | 05:54 -00:08 | 01:01:19 +00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:21 | 01:07:25 | 05:54 -00:33 | 01:07:13 +00:12 |
| Running 8 | 06:52 | 01:12:46 | 06:48 +00:04 | 01:13:07 -00:21 |
| Wall Balls | 06:54 | 01:19:38 | 07:40 -00:46 | 01:19:55 -00:17 |
| Roxzone | 09:19 | 01:35:44 | 08:09 +01:10 | 01:35:44 |
In terms of pacing, Andreas maintained a consistent pace throughout the race, with some segments being slightly slower or faster than average. His overall running time of 00:45:47 was 21 seconds slower than the average, indicating that he may need to focus on improving his running speed and endurance. It is worth noting that his best running lap was 00:04:45, which suggests that he has the potential to excel in running with the right training.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanzini Jacopo | 2024 Milan | 01:35:16 | |
| Camacho Gómez Rafael | 2024 Malaga | 01:35:32 | |
| Roberts Steve | 2024 London | 01:36:13 | |
| Underhill Ben | 2023 Birmingham | 01:35:31 | |
| Murray Gerard | 2024 Dublin | 01:36:04 | |
| Musaad Martin | 2024 London | 01:35:24 | |
| Hermans Jos | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:35:23 | |
| Cloono Dean | 2024 London | 01:35:20 | |
| Donaldson Chris | 2023 Birmingham | 01:35:54 | |
| Horne Nigel | 2022 London | 01:35:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
