Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 117 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schmid Gary's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schmid Gary's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schmid Gary's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schmid Gary's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 15:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:48 | 01:06:14 to 58:26 | 49.3% |
| Wall Balls | 03:24 | 14:18 to 10:54 | 21.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:44 | 09:55 to 08:11 | 10.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:33 | 10:25 to 08:52 | 9.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:44 | 05:15 to 04:31 | 4.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:15 | 07:55 to 07:40 | 1.6% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:48 to 05:40 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 05:12 to 05:05 | 0.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 03:22 to 03:15 | 0.7% |
| Schmid Gary | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:25 | 00:00 | 05:56 +00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:12 | 06:25 | 05:08 +00:04 | 05:56 +00:29 |
| Running 2 | 06:25 | 11:37 | 06:46 -00:21 | 11:04 +00:33 |
| Sled Push | 05:15 | 18:02 | 04:31 +00:44 | 17:50 +00:12 |
| Running 3 | 07:40 | 23:17 | 07:56 -00:16 | 22:21 +00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 07:55 | 30:57 | 08:20 -00:25 | 30:17 +00:40 |
| Running 4 | 08:05 | 38:52 | 08:02 +00:03 | 38:37 +00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:25 | 46:57 | 09:40 +00:45 | 46:39 +00:18 |
| Running 5 | 08:47 | 57:22 | 08:43 +00:04 | 56:19 +01:03 |
| Rowing | 05:48 | 01:06:09 | 05:51 -00:03 | 01:05:02 +01:07 |
| Running 6 | 08:21 | 01:11:57 | 08:04 +00:17 | 01:10:53 +01:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:22 | 01:20:18 | 03:14 +00:08 | 01:18:57 +01:21 |
| Running 7 | 08:13 | 01:23:40 | 08:32 -00:19 | 01:22:11 +01:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:55 | 01:31:53 | 09:24 +00:31 | 01:30:43 +01:10 |
| Running 8 | 12:22 | 01:41:48 | 11:31 +00:51 | 01:40:07 +01:41 |
| Wall Balls | 14:18 | 01:54:10 | 12:24 +01:54 | 01:51:38 +02:32 |
| Roxzone | 08:06 | 02:16:25 | 12:23 -04:17 | 02:16:25 |
Gary Schmid's performance in the 2024 Karlsruhe HYROX race places him in the top 68% overall and 79% within his age group, indicating a competitive but improvable position. His total running time was 00:26 faster than average, suggesting a strength in running, albeit with a potential for improved efficiency in strength-based exercises. The significant time saved in the Roxzone indicates excellent transition efficiency, yet this contrasts with slower-than-average performances in several strength-focused segments. Gary's profile leans towards a runner, highlighted by his faster total running time. However, to elevate his competitiveness, focusing on strength training, especially in underperforming segments, is vital.
In conclusion, Gary Schmid has demonstrated a solid foundation in running efficiency, which he can leverage to improve his overall HYROX performance. By focusing on targeted strength training, refining his race strategy, and optimizing recovery, Gary can expect to see substantial improvements in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schmid Gary | 2024 Karlsruhe | 02:16:25 | |
| Kumar Sathish | 2023 Hong Kong | 02:16:27 | |
| Harper Iain | 2022 London | 02:16:34 | |
| Patel Mihir | 2024 New York | 02:16:05 | |
| Litz Julian | 2023 Stuttgart | 02:15:55 | |
| Bin Jamaludin Muhammad Jasmani | 2024 Singapore | 02:16:47 | |
| Chaabi Rami | 2022 Essen | 02:16:05 | |
| Manzo Alessandro | 2023 Milan | 02:16:39 | |
| Bayliss Aaron | 2023 Birmingham | 02:16:18 | |
| Sanchez Axel | 2024 Dublin | 02:16:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Stuttgart | 02:02:57 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
