Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Riley Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Riley Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Riley Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Riley Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:52 | 07:14 to 06:22 | 52.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:47 | 05:50 to 05:03 | 47.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:36 to 02:36 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:11 to 42:11 | 0.0% |
| Riley Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 04:43 +00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 05:12 | 04:29 -00:24 | 04:43 +00:29 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 09:17 | 05:06 -00:28 | 09:12 +00:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:36 | 13:55 | 03:00 -00:24 | 14:18 -00:23 |
| Running 3 | 04:46 | 16:31 | 05:33 -00:47 | 17:18 -00:47 |
| Sled Pull | 04:45 | 21:17 | 05:06 -00:21 | 22:51 -01:34 |
| Running 4 | 05:01 | 26:02 | 05:32 -00:31 | 27:57 -01:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:15 | 31:03 | 05:37 -00:22 | 33:29 -02:26 |
| Running 5 | 05:19 | 36:18 | 05:42 -00:23 | 39:06 -02:48 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 41:37 | 04:52 -00:06 | 44:48 -03:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:20 | 46:23 | 05:34 -00:14 | 49:40 -03:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 51:43 | 02:15 -00:11 | 55:14 -03:31 |
| Running 7 | 05:20 | 53:47 | 05:33 -00:13 | 57:29 -03:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:50 | 59:07 | 05:21 +00:29 | 01:03:02 -03:55 |
| Running 8 | 06:39 | 01:04:57 | 06:13 +00:26 | 01:08:23 -03:26 |
| Wall Balls | 07:14 | 01:11:36 | 06:48 +00:26 | 01:14:36 -03:00 |
| Roxzone | 09:52 | 01:28:35 | 07:11 +02:41 | 01:28:35 |
Paul Riley has shown a commendable performance in the race, ranking in the top 38% of 4107 athletes overall and top 37% in his age group of 40-44. His total running time was 00:42:11, which is 2 minutes and 2 seconds faster than the average time, indicating a strong running profile. However, his overall time was 01:28:35, which suggests a need for improvement in the transition time and strength-based exercises.
Paul started off slower than average in the first running segment, possibly to conserve energy for the following segments. He demonstrated excellent pacing in later running segments, consistently outperforming the average times. However, the decrease in performance in the last running segment and increased time spent in the Roxzone indicate fatigue setting in toward the end of the race.
Paul's performance dropped significantly in the Roxzone, Wall Balls, and Sandbag Lunges segments, with him taking longer than average to complete these exercises. This suggests a need for more focused strength training and improved transitions.
Moving forward, Paul should look into implementing a few race strategies to enhance his performance. Firstly, he should maintain a steady pace in the initial running segments to conserve energy for strength-based exercises and later running segments. Secondly, focusing on quick transitions can help reduce the time spent in the Roxzone. Lastly, incorporating strength training in his routine would help improve his performance in strength-based segments, making him a more rounded athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Henjes Gunnar | 2024 Katowice | 01:28:11 | |
| Zufas Jerome | 2024 Hamburg | 01:28:49 | |
| Schmitt Daniel | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:28:06 | |
| Mayer Alexander | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:28:20 | |
| Daniels Jiles | 2024 Dallas | 01:28:43 | |
| Müller Manuel | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:28:40 | |
| Neill Rob | 2022 Birmingham | 01:28:05 | |
| Horn Andreas | 2023 München | 01:28:52 | |
| Coleman Gareth | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:12 | |
| Nagel Matthias | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:28:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:16:55 | |
| 2023 London | 01:25:36 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
