Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 98 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Powell Emily's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Powell Emily's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Powell Emily's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Powell Emily's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:04 | 47:52 to 46:48 | 37.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:55 | 06:58 to 06:03 | 32.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:50 | 04:00 to 03:10 | 29.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 07:05 to 07:05 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:26 to 07:26 | 0.0% |
| Powell Emily | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:12 | 00:00 | 05:02 +01:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:51 | 06:12 | 05:03 -00:12 | 05:02 +01:10 |
| Running 2 | 05:23 | 11:03 | 05:35 -00:12 | 10:05 +00:58 |
| Sled Push | 04:18 | 16:26 | 04:42 -00:24 | 15:40 +00:46 |
| Running 3 | 05:42 | 20:44 | 05:59 -00:17 | 20:22 +00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 07:05 | 26:26 | 07:47 -00:42 | 26:21 +00:05 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 33:31 | 05:58 -00:11 | 34:08 -00:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:58 | 39:18 | 06:11 +00:47 | 40:06 -00:48 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 46:16 | 06:06 -00:18 | 46:17 -00:01 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 52:04 | 05:29 -00:19 | 52:23 -00:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:52 | 57:14 | 06:02 -00:10 | 57:52 -00:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:00 | 01:03:06 | 03:18 +00:42 | 01:03:54 -00:48 |
| Running 7 | 05:56 | 01:07:06 | 06:07 -00:11 | 01:07:12 -00:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:27 | 01:13:02 | 06:14 -00:47 | 01:13:19 -00:17 |
| Running 8 | 07:17 | 01:18:29 | 06:44 +00:33 | 01:19:33 -01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 07:26 | 01:25:46 | 08:02 -00:36 | 01:26:17 -00:31 |
| Roxzone | 08:37 | 01:41:39 | 07:20 +01:17 | 01:41:39 |
Emily Powell showcased commendable strength in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. Her overall rank of 142 placed her in the top 27% of 524 athletes and within the top 25% of her age group. Despite her overall time being faster than average, her total running time was slower by 00:16 minutes. This suggests that Emily has more of a strength-training profile, which was reflected in the faster times she achieved in strength-based exercises like the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Rowing, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls.
However, her slower start in Running 1 and slower transition times in the roxzone indicated potential areas for improvement. Emily's pacing strategy also needs to be reviewed, as the data suggests that she may have started the race too slow, which could have affected her overall performance.
Emily should consider implementing the following strategies for better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Myo Elina | 2024 Singapore | 01:41:54 | |
| Menhart Petra | 2023 Birmingham | 01:41:35 | |
| Bertolini Alice | 2024 Turin | 01:41:26 | |
| Osullivan Jennifer | 2024 Madrid | 01:41:38 | |
| Smedley Vicky | 2023 Manchester | 01:41:16 | |
| Ruscoe Jenny | 2024 Malaga | 01:41:17 | |
| Scheuer Johanna | 2023 Hamburg | 01:41:40 | |
| De Smet Steffi | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:41:52 | |
| Mendoza Quintana Nydia Fatima | 2024 Mexico City | 01:41:28 | |
| Okuneva Yana | 2022 Dallas | 01:41:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:59:20 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
