Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Osborne Trevor's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Osborne Trevor's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Osborne Trevor's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Osborne Trevor's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:20 | 07:05 to 05:45 | 31.5% |
| Sled Push | 01:08 | 03:43 to 02:35 | 26.8% |
| Sled Pull | 01:04 | 05:30 to 04:26 | 25.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:21 | 05:04 to 04:43 | 8.3% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 04:53 to 04:40 | 5.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:25 to 04:19 | 2.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 04:39 to 04:37 | 0.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:55 to 01:55 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:40 to 38:40 | 0.0% |
| Osborne Trevor | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:48 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 04:48 | 04:24 +00:01 | 04:29 +00:19 |
| Running 2 | 04:21 | 09:13 | 04:51 -00:30 | 08:53 +00:20 |
| Sled Push | 03:43 | 13:34 | 02:50 +00:53 | 13:44 -00:10 |
| Running 3 | 04:54 | 17:17 | 05:14 -00:20 | 16:34 +00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 05:30 | 22:11 | 04:45 +00:45 | 21:48 +00:23 |
| Running 4 | 04:45 | 27:41 | 05:13 -00:28 | 26:33 +01:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:04 | 32:26 | 05:02 +00:02 | 31:46 +00:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:02 | 37:30 | 05:22 -00:20 | 36:48 +00:42 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 42:32 | 04:45 +00:08 | 42:10 +00:22 |
| Running 6 | 04:44 | 47:25 | 05:15 -00:31 | 46:55 +00:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:55 | 52:09 | 02:07 -00:12 | 52:10 -00:01 |
| Running 7 | 04:58 | 54:04 | 05:13 -00:15 | 54:17 -00:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:39 | 59:02 | 04:53 -00:14 | 59:30 -00:28 |
| Running 8 | 05:11 | 01:03:41 | 05:44 -00:33 | 01:04:23 -00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 07:05 | 01:08:52 | 06:15 +00:50 | 01:10:07 -01:15 |
| Roxzone | 06:58 | 01:22:47 | 06:25 +00:33 | 01:22:47 |
Firstly, congratulations to Trevor Osborne for a fantastic performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX. Trevor put in an impressive race, finishing in the top 18% of his age group and in the top 28% overall. His overall time of 01:22:47 is commendable, especially considering his excellent running time of 00:38:40 which is faster than the average by 02:55. This suggests that Trevor has a strong runner profile, as he consistently finished running segments faster than the average time.
However, Trevor's pacing at the start of the race was slower than average during the Running 1 segment, but he managed to recover and excel in the following segments. This indicates that Trevor may need to focus on his start, ensuring a more aggressive initial pace to set the tone for the rest of the race.
Looking ahead to future races, Trevor can implement several strategies to improve his performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moreno Paredes Juanfrancisco | 2023 Madrid | 01:22:51 | |
| Bray Alessio | 2024 Rimini | 01:22:48 | |
| Häußler Simon | 2023 Hannover | 01:22:51 | |
| Pakula Alex | 2022 Dallas | 01:22:50 | |
| Zuza Vadim | 2024 Milan | 01:22:24 | |
| Harris Rhodri | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:56 | |
| Puente Contreras Felipe | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:22:19 | |
| Grundmann Martijn | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:22:52 | |
| Hardie Gary | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:07 | |
| Cardoso Rui | 2023 Barcelona | 01:22:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:23:19 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
