Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 866 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Matthews Libby's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Matthews Libby's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Matthews Libby's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Matthews Libby's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 04:17 | 09:52 to 05:35 | 68.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:54 | 07:10 to 06:16 | 14.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:36 | 07:34 to 06:58 | 9.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:36 to 02:24 | 3.2% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:44 to 05:34 | 2.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 03:03 to 02:59 | 1.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:09 to 05:09 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:12 to 45:12 | 0.0% |
| Matthews Libby | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:19 | 00:00 | 05:32 -00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:09 | 05:19 | 05:18 -00:09 | 05:32 -00:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:34 | 10:28 | 05:59 -00:25 | 10:50 -00:22 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 16:02 | 03:01 +00:02 | 16:49 -00:47 |
| Running 3 | 05:28 | 19:05 | 06:18 -00:50 | 19:50 -00:45 |
| Sled Pull | 07:10 | 24:33 | 06:28 +00:42 | 26:08 -01:35 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 31:43 | 06:21 -00:52 | 32:36 -00:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:34 | 37:12 | 07:10 +00:24 | 38:57 -01:45 |
| Running 5 | 05:56 | 44:46 | 06:33 -00:37 | 46:07 -01:21 |
| Rowing | 05:44 | 50:42 | 05:37 +00:07 | 52:40 -01:58 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 56:26 | 06:26 -00:40 | 58:17 -01:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:36 | 01:02:12 | 02:28 +00:08 | 01:04:43 -02:31 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 01:04:48 | 06:24 -00:52 | 01:07:11 -02:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:04 | 01:10:20 | 05:26 -00:22 | 01:13:35 -03:15 |
| Running 8 | 06:12 | 01:15:24 | 07:03 -00:51 | 01:19:01 -03:37 |
| Wall Balls | 09:52 | 01:21:36 | 05:41 +04:11 | 01:26:04 -04:28 |
| Roxzone | 08:31 | 01:39:51 | 08:06 +00:25 | 01:39:51 |
Libby Matthews put up a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event. She finished in the top 22% overall and in the top 25% in her age group, demonstrating a balanced blend of strength and endurance. Her total running time was 5:47 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Her pacing was excellent during the initial segments, as she started fast and maintained a consistent pace. However, her roxzone time was slightly slower than average, suggesting a need for improving transitions and overall fitness.
Going forward, Libby should consider the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| StringerCalvert Genevieve | 2024 Manchester | 01:40:05 | |
| Moseley Cleo | 2024 Dublin | 01:39:48 | |
| Saldana Stephanie | 2024 Houston | 01:40:10 | |
| Gebauer Selina | 2019 Leipzig | 01:40:03 | |
| Brown Jaime | 2023 Anaheim | 01:39:39 | |
| Nunn Gabby | 2024 London | 01:40:00 | |
| Bromba Melanie | 2022 Bremen | 01:40:15 | |
| Büttner Tina | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:40:16 | |
| Rothe Kristina | 2021 Leipzig | 01:40:16 | |
| Kingham Jennifer | 2024 Stockholm | 01:39:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator