Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 813 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:39 (From 09:21 to 06:42) | 39.8% |
| BBJ | 02:37 (From 09:54 to 07:17) | 39.3% |
| Rowing | 00:35 (From 05:52 to 05:17) | 8.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:31 (From 05:20 to 04:49) | 7.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 (From 03:03 to 02:45) | 4.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 03:17 to 03:17) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 05:34 to 05:34) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 07:07 to 07:07) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 49:47 to 49:47) | 0.0% |
| Lewis Patrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:44 | 00:00 | 05:25 +01:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:20 | 06:44 | 04:47 +00:33 | 05:25 +01:19 |
| Running 2 | 07:31 | 12:04 | 05:56 +01:35 | 10:12 +01:52 |
| Sled Push | 03:17 | 19:35 | 03:43 -00:26 | 16:08 +03:27 |
| Running 3 | 05:43 | 22:52 | 06:35 -00:52 | 19:51 +03:01 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 28:35 | 06:26 -00:52 | 26:26 +02:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 34:09 | 06:36 -00:57 | 32:52 +01:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:54 | 39:48 | 07:26 +02:28 | 39:28 +00:20 |
| Running 5 | 05:51 | 49:42 | 06:56 -01:05 | 46:54 +02:48 |
| Rowing | 05:52 | 55:33 | 05:19 +00:33 | 53:50 +01:43 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 01:01:25 | 06:42 -00:58 | 59:09 +02:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:03 | 01:07:09 | 02:45 +00:18 | 01:05:51 +01:18 |
| Running 7 | 05:36 | 01:10:12 | 06:45 -01:09 | 01:08:36 +01:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:21 | 01:15:48 | 07:00 +02:21 | 01:15:21 +00:27 |
| Running 8 | 07:04 | 01:25:09 | 08:13 -01:09 | 01:22:21 +02:48 |
| Wall Balls | 07:07 | 01:32:13 | 09:06 -01:59 | 01:30:34 +01:39 |
| Roxzone | 10:22 | 01:49:34 | 09:54 +00:28 | 01:49:34 |
Patrick Lewis showcased an impressive performance, placing in the top 60% of all athletes and top 56% in his age group. His overall time was 01:49:34, with a total running time of 00:49:47, which is 03:41 faster than the average. This indicates that he has a strong runner profile and his running performance is highly commendable. However, his pacing seemed to be a bit inconsistent, with some running segments being slower than average, specifically Running 1 and Running 2, while others were significantly faster than average, such as Running 3, Running 4 and Running 5. It's worth noting that despite some slower segments, his total running time indicates a strong overall running performance.
The following areas have been identified as potential areas for improvement for Patrick:
Patrick should consider implementing the following strategies during his races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Reinöhl Uli | 2019 Hamburg | 01:49:51 | |
| Pringle Lewis | 2024 Glasgow | 01:49:45 | |
| Ferreira André | 2023 Paris | 01:49:19 | |
| Cameron Kirk | 2024 Houston | 01:50:03 | |
| Goodman Cooper | 2023 Chicago | 01:49:25 | |
| Cruz Jose Luis | 2024 Dallas | 01:49:22 | |
| Omar Ahmed | 2024 Paris | 01:49:55 | |
| Lo Jason | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:49:42 | |
| Binning Nik | 2024 Madrid | 01:49:25 | |
| O'Brien Kevin | 2024 Dublin | 01:49:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Lewis Patrick
