Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lee Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lee Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lee Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lee Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:45 | 06:22 to 04:37 | 41.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:51 | 05:34 to 04:43 | 20.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:38 | 06:23 to 05:45 | 15.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 05:03 to 04:26 | 14.7% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 04:59 to 04:40 | 7.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:20 to 04:19 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:07 to 38:07 | 0.0% |
| Lee Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:16 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 05:16 | 04:24 -00:04 | 04:29 +00:47 |
| Running 2 | 04:28 | 09:36 | 04:51 -00:23 | 08:53 +00:43 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 14:04 | 02:51 -00:20 | 13:44 +00:20 |
| Running 3 | 04:33 | 16:35 | 05:15 -00:42 | 16:35 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 05:03 | 21:08 | 04:45 +00:18 | 21:50 -00:42 |
| Running 4 | 04:39 | 26:11 | 05:14 -00:35 | 26:35 -00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:34 | 30:50 | 05:02 +00:32 | 31:49 -00:59 |
| Running 5 | 04:49 | 36:24 | 05:23 -00:34 | 36:51 -00:27 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 41:13 | 04:45 +00:14 | 42:14 -01:01 |
| Running 6 | 04:39 | 46:12 | 05:16 -00:37 | 46:59 -00:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 50:51 | 02:08 -00:10 | 52:15 -01:24 |
| Running 7 | 04:45 | 52:49 | 05:15 -00:30 | 54:23 -01:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:22 | 57:34 | 04:54 +01:28 | 59:38 -02:04 |
| Running 8 | 05:02 | 01:03:56 | 05:46 -00:44 | 01:04:32 -00:36 |
| Wall Balls | 06:23 | 01:08:58 | 06:15 +00:08 | 01:10:18 -01:20 |
| Roxzone | 07:48 | 01:23:02 | 06:29 +01:19 | 01:23:02 |
Matthew Lee showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. Being placed in the top 29% of 4107 athletes overall and top 35% in his age group (30-34), Matthew's performance was largely driven by his strong running skills. His total running time of 00:38:07 was 03:38 faster than the average, indicating a strong proficiency in this area. However, his performance in areas requiring strength appears to require some improvement. His pacing strategy seemed to be effective, as he maintained a steady pace throughout the race despite some segments being slower than average. These slower segments are likely areas of opportunity for Matthew to improve upon in future races.
Going forward, Matthew could benefit from adopting the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gzz Mikke | 2024 Mexico City | 01:23:29 | |
| Bradley James | 2024 Stockholm | 01:22:57 | |
| Kalambokis Nicholas | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:10 | |
| Fairweather Andy | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:22:41 | |
| Usson Robin | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:23:08 | |
| Dejon Daniel | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:23:30 | |
| Feely Michael | 2024 Taipei | 01:23:12 | |
| Lovera Suárez Oscar | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:22:41 | |
| Henry Mikey | 2023 Birmingham | 01:23:12 | |
| Sherratt John | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:23:30 | |
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:28 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:28:30 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
