Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 831 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Isaac James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Isaac James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Isaac James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Isaac James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:18 | 08:29 to 07:11 | 42.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:52 | 07:29 to 06:37 | 28.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:32 | 04:14 to 03:42 | 17.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 03:02 to 02:44 | 9.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 | 06:23 to 06:19 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:28 to 07:28 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 48:51 to 48:51 | 0.0% |
| Isaac James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:30 | 00:00 | 05:23 +01:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 06:30 | 04:45 -00:01 | 05:23 +01:07 |
| Running 2 | 05:45 | 11:14 | 05:55 -00:10 | 10:08 +01:06 |
| Sled Push | 04:14 | 16:59 | 03:37 +00:37 | 16:03 +00:56 |
| Running 3 | 05:51 | 21:13 | 06:34 -00:43 | 19:40 +01:33 |
| Sled Pull | 06:23 | 27:04 | 06:19 +00:04 | 26:14 +00:50 |
| Running 4 | 05:50 | 33:27 | 06:33 -00:43 | 32:33 +00:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:29 | 39:17 | 07:22 +01:07 | 39:06 +00:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:55 | 47:46 | 06:51 -00:56 | 46:28 +01:18 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 53:41 | 05:16 -00:04 | 53:19 +00:22 |
| Running 6 | 05:59 | 58:53 | 06:39 -00:40 | 58:35 +00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:02 | 01:04:52 | 02:40 +00:22 | 01:05:14 -00:22 |
| Running 7 | 06:10 | 01:07:54 | 06:37 -00:27 | 01:07:54 +00:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:29 | 01:14:04 | 06:53 +00:36 | 01:14:31 -00:27 |
| Running 8 | 06:54 | 01:21:33 | 07:59 -01:05 | 01:21:24 +00:09 |
| Wall Balls | 07:28 | 01:28:27 | 08:57 -01:29 | 01:29:23 -00:56 |
| Roxzone | 12:08 | 01:47:56 | 09:36 +02:32 | 01:47:56 |
James Isaac demonstrated notable strengths in his total running time, ranking faster than average in this category. This suggests he has a strong runner profile, with an exceptional capacity for endurance. He maintained a consistent pace throughout the race, not starting off too fast or slow compared to the average. However, there were areas where he lost time, specifically in the roxzone, indicating his transitions and overall fitness may need improvement.
For future races, James should aim to start off at a solid pace without overexerting himself in the initial segments. This will help ensure he has sufficient energy for the latter parts of the race. He should also focus on efficient transitions between different exercises to minimize downtime. Additionally, incorporating more strength training into his regimen could help improve his performance in the strength-based segments of the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaakik Amine | 2024 Paris | 01:47:36 | |
| Menil Maximilien | 2024 Paris | 01:47:27 | |
| Santana Santana Iván | 2022 Valencia | 01:47:34 | |
| Broadie Christopher | 2023 Chicago | 01:48:01 | |
| Wilke Alexander | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:48:22 | |
| Birrell James | 2024 Melbourne | 01:48:26 | |
| Koh Feng Shin Daryl | 2023 Singapore | 01:48:11 | |
| Drozdowski Alex | 2022 London | 01:47:42 | |
| Margreiter Philipp | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:47:28 | |
| Van Der Reijnst Robin | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:47:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:41:30 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
