Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hubbard Joshua's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hubbard Joshua's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hubbard Joshua's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hubbard Joshua's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:23 | 07:31 to 06:08 | 55.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:42 | 05:35 to 04:53 | 28.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 04:52 to 04:42 | 6.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:09 | 05:14 to 05:05 | 6.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 02:50 to 02:45 | 3.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:02 to 41:02 | 0.0% |
| Hubbard Joshua | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:03 | 00:00 | 04:38 +00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 05:03 | 04:27 -00:22 | 04:38 +00:25 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 09:08 | 04:59 -00:14 | 09:05 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 13:53 | 02:56 -00:06 | 14:04 -00:11 |
| Running 3 | 05:27 | 16:43 | 05:26 +00:01 | 17:00 -00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 04:52 | 22:10 | 05:00 -00:08 | 22:26 -00:16 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 27:02 | 05:25 -00:20 | 27:26 -00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:14 | 32:07 | 05:21 -00:07 | 32:51 -00:44 |
| Running 5 | 05:21 | 37:21 | 05:35 -00:14 | 38:12 -00:51 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 42:42 | 04:49 -00:09 | 43:47 -01:05 |
| Running 6 | 05:01 | 47:22 | 05:28 -00:27 | 48:36 -01:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 52:23 | 02:12 -00:15 | 54:04 -01:41 |
| Running 7 | 05:02 | 54:20 | 05:25 -00:23 | 56:16 -01:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:35 | 59:22 | 05:07 +00:28 | 01:01:41 -02:19 |
| Running 8 | 05:21 | 01:04:57 | 06:03 -00:42 | 01:06:48 -01:51 |
| Wall Balls | 07:31 | 01:10:18 | 06:34 +00:57 | 01:12:51 -02:33 |
| Roxzone | 08:42 | 01:26:22 | 06:57 +01:45 | 01:26:22 |
Joshua Hubbard, in the HYROX Birmingham 2024 event, delivered a commendable performance, ranking in the top 35% of all athletes, and the top 41% in his age group (30-34). Particularly striking was his impressive total running time of 00:41:02, which was 02:14 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, his start was on the slower side, with his first running segment being slower than the average. Joshua managed to pick up his pace in the subsequent segments, finishing well above average in most of them.
Considering Joshua's performance, the following strategies could be implemented to improve his race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Murphy Rob | 2023 Manchester | 01:26:36 | |
| Richter John | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:26:13 | |
| Bonilla Gil Alejandro | 2024 Malaga | 01:26:09 | |
| Mcmenemy Alan | 2023 Manchester | 01:26:02 | |
| Ratineau Christophe | 2024 Marseille | 01:26:30 | |
| Greer Mark | 2024 Dublin | 01:26:00 | |
| Walter Thomas | 2022 Hamburg | 01:25:57 | |
| Buckley Andrew | 2023 Paris | 01:26:33 | |
| Curty Alexandre | 2023 Paris | 01:26:38 | |
| Weninger Wolfgang | 2019 Wien | 01:25:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
