Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Harwood Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Harwood Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Harwood Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Harwood Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:16 | 07:05 to 04:49 | 31.5% |
| Wall Balls | 02:13 | 08:32 to 06:19 | 30.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:44 | 05:58 to 05:14 | 10.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:41 | 05:07 to 04:26 | 9.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:38 | 03:27 to 02:49 | 8.8% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 05:04 to 04:47 | 3.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:12 | 05:13 to 05:01 | 2.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:18 to 02:07 | 2.5% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 36:49 to 36:49 | 0.0% |
| Harwood Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:00 | 00:00 | 04:41 +00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:07 | 05:00 | 04:29 +00:38 | 04:41 +00:19 |
| Running 2 | 04:12 | 10:07 | 05:05 -00:53 | 09:10 +00:57 |
| Sled Push | 03:27 | 14:19 | 02:59 +00:28 | 14:15 +00:04 |
| Running 3 | 04:28 | 17:46 | 05:33 -01:05 | 17:14 +00:32 |
| Sled Pull | 07:05 | 22:14 | 05:05 +02:00 | 22:47 -00:33 |
| Running 4 | 04:33 | 29:19 | 05:31 -00:58 | 27:52 +01:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:58 | 33:52 | 05:34 +00:24 | 33:23 +00:29 |
| Running 5 | 04:38 | 39:50 | 05:42 -01:04 | 38:57 +00:53 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 44:28 | 04:52 +00:12 | 44:39 -00:11 |
| Running 6 | 04:31 | 49:32 | 05:33 -01:02 | 49:31 +00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 54:03 | 02:14 +00:04 | 55:04 -01:01 |
| Running 7 | 04:31 | 56:21 | 05:32 -01:01 | 57:18 -00:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:13 | 01:00:52 | 05:18 -00:05 | 01:02:50 -01:58 |
| Running 8 | 05:00 | 01:06:05 | 06:11 -01:11 | 01:08:08 -02:03 |
| Wall Balls | 08:32 | 01:11:05 | 06:45 +01:47 | 01:14:19 -03:14 |
| Roxzone | 08:41 | 01:28:08 | 07:04 +01:37 | 01:28:08 |
Mark Harwood demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race event. Despite being in the 40-44 age group, Mark has significantly outperformed many of his younger competitors, landing in the top 37% of all athletes and top 36% in his age group. His overall time of 01:28:08 is a testament to his high level of fitness and dedication to the sport. A standout feature of Mark's performance was his total running time, which was 07:12 faster than the average. This indicates that Mark has a strong runner profile and could focus more on improving his strength to enhance overall performance.
Mark's pacing appeared to be consistent throughout the race. He began the race slightly slower than average during Running 1 but was able to significantly improve his speed in the subsequent segments, consistently finishing faster than average from Running 2 to Running 8. This suggests a tactical approach, conserving energy at the start and progressively increasing speed as the race progressed.
Mark should consider adopting the following strategies for better performance in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesojedec Miha | 2024 Milan | 01:27:44 | |
| Yeargan Jared | 2023 Dallas | 01:28:14 | |
| Dahlman Martin | 2023 Stockholm | 01:28:18 | |
| Hashem Mostafa | 2024 Dubai | 01:27:47 | |
| Jonietz Oliver | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:28:34 | |
| Ho Adrian | 2024 Singapore | 01:28:17 | |
| Kautz Marco | 2024 Köln | 01:27:47 | |
| Chhabria Vivek | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:28:37 | |
| Faleński Maciej | 2024 Poznan | 01:27:39 | |
| Fairhurstgroethe Adam | 2023 London | 01:28:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
