Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Green Mike's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Green Mike's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Green Mike's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Green Mike's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:06 | 04:52 to 03:46 | 30.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:46 | 05:31 to 04:45 | 20.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 02:48 to 02:08 | 18.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:25 | 04:08 to 03:43 | 11.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 04:16 to 03:52 | 10.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:17 to 04:07 | 4.5% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:30 to 04:25 | 2.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:44 to 01:40 | 1.8% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 35:22 to 35:22 | 0.0% |
| Green Mike | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:40 | 00:00 | 04:07 +00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 04:40 | 04:15 +00:02 | 04:07 +00:33 |
| Running 2 | 04:03 | 08:57 | 04:24 -00:21 | 08:22 +00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 13:00 | 02:31 +00:17 | 12:46 +00:14 |
| Running 3 | 04:17 | 15:48 | 04:45 -00:28 | 15:17 +00:31 |
| Sled Pull | 04:08 | 20:05 | 04:09 -00:01 | 20:02 +00:03 |
| Running 4 | 04:27 | 24:13 | 04:43 -00:16 | 24:11 +00:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:52 | 28:40 | 04:18 +00:34 | 28:54 -00:14 |
| Running 5 | 04:25 | 33:32 | 04:51 -00:26 | 33:12 +00:20 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 37:57 | 04:32 -00:02 | 38:03 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 04:20 | 42:27 | 04:45 -00:25 | 42:35 -00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:44 | 46:47 | 01:53 -00:09 | 47:20 -00:33 |
| Running 7 | 04:25 | 48:31 | 04:44 -00:19 | 49:13 -00:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:16 | 52:56 | 04:15 +00:01 | 53:57 -01:01 |
| Running 8 | 04:49 | 57:12 | 05:04 -00:15 | 58:12 -01:00 |
| Wall Balls | 05:31 | 01:02:01 | 05:22 +00:09 | 01:03:16 -01:15 |
| Roxzone | 06:39 | 01:14:01 | 05:23 +01:16 | 01:14:01 |
Firstly, congratulations to Mike Green on his impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox event. Overall, Mike placed in the top 11% of all participants and in the top 13% within his age group, which is a commendable achievement. His total running time was 2:14 minutes faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, the Roxzone segment was 1:23 minutes slower than the average, suggesting that transitions and overall fitness could be areas of focus for future training.
Mike showed a consistent performance in the first four running segments, improving his time progressively from the first to the fourth segment. This suggests a well-paced approach, however, the relatively slower start in the first segment might indicate a need for a stronger start in future races to further optimize performance.
Implementing a few strategic changes could help improve Mike's performance in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hickinbotham Steve | 2021 Birmingham | 01:14:21 | |
| Davis Will | 2023 Melbourne | 01:14:01 | |
| Tam Gordon | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:13:41 | |
| Scheirlinck Erik | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:14:17 | |
| Dow Luke | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:14:02 | |
| Fortune Paul | 2023 Glasgow | 01:14:24 | |
| Visagie Tyler | 2021 Austin | 01:14:18 | |
| TaylorEdwards Dan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:14:01 | |
| Lucero Aleshandro | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:13:46 | |
| Giménez Adsuar Gerard | 2024 Marseille | 01:13:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
