Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 562 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gajczak Natasha's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gajczak Natasha's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gajczak Natasha's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gajczak Natasha's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:49 | 09:15 to 06:26 | 54.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:03 | 08:55 to 07:52 | 20.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:32 | 05:59 to 05:27 | 10.4% |
| Rowing | 00:31 | 06:17 to 05:46 | 10.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:52 to 02:38 | 4.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:13 to 03:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:51 to 05:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 51:28 to 51:28 | 0.0% |
| Gajczak Natasha | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:35 | 00:00 | 05:48 +01:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:59 | 07:35 | 05:27 +00:32 | 05:48 +01:47 |
| Running 2 | 06:08 | 13:34 | 06:21 -00:13 | 11:15 +02:19 |
| Sled Push | 03:13 | 19:42 | 03:17 -00:04 | 17:36 +02:06 |
| Running 3 | 06:12 | 22:55 | 06:42 -00:30 | 20:53 +02:02 |
| Sled Pull | 05:51 | 29:07 | 06:58 -01:07 | 27:35 +01:32 |
| Running 4 | 06:15 | 34:58 | 06:47 -00:32 | 34:33 +00:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:55 | 41:13 | 08:06 +00:49 | 41:20 -00:07 |
| Running 5 | 06:27 | 50:08 | 07:04 -00:37 | 49:26 +00:42 |
| Rowing | 06:17 | 56:35 | 05:48 +00:29 | 56:30 +00:05 |
| Running 6 | 06:09 | 01:02:52 | 06:56 -00:47 | 01:02:18 +00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:52 | 01:09:01 | 02:37 +00:15 | 01:09:14 -00:13 |
| Running 7 | 06:08 | 01:11:53 | 06:56 -00:48 | 01:11:51 +00:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:21 | 01:18:01 | 06:04 -00:43 | 01:18:47 -00:46 |
| Running 8 | 06:37 | 01:23:22 | 07:46 -01:09 | 01:24:51 -01:29 |
| Wall Balls | 09:15 | 01:29:59 | 06:25 +02:50 | 01:32:37 -02:38 |
| Roxzone | 09:02 | 01:48:09 | 09:07 -00:05 | 01:48:09 |
Natasha Gajczak delivered an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. Ranking in the top 27% of all athletes and the top 26% in her age group, she demonstrated a commendable level of fitness. Notably, her total running time was 03:13 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. This was further confirmed by her consistently faster-than-average split times in all running segments from running 2 to running 8. However, her slow start in running 1 could suggest a need for better pacing strategy at the beginning of the race. Natasha's overall time suggests a balanced ability, excelling in both strength and running, with room for improvement in the transitions between exercises.
For better race performance, Natasha should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Georgia | 2022 Dallas | 01:48:24 | |
| Dodd Rebecca | 2023 Chicago | 01:48:21 | |
| Kristenova Jana | 2019 Wien | 01:48:39 | |
| Shek Jacqueline | 2023 Singapore | 01:48:10 | |
| Zechner Karin | 2019 Wien | 01:47:45 | |
| Gotowała Karolina | 2023 Warschau | 01:47:47 | |
| Sanchez Daisy | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:47:54 | |
| Dunleavy Maria | 2023 Dublin | 01:48:38 | |
| Lennon Bryony | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:48:31 | |
| Eilers Nadja | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:47:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
