Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Maastricht European Championships using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Engbersen Wanja's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Engbersen Wanja's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Engbersen Wanja's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Engbersen Wanja's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:05 | 44:06 to 43:01 | 22.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:49 | 05:54 to 05:05 | 16.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:44 | 02:52 to 02:08 | 15.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:33 | 05:00 to 04:27 | 11.2% |
| Rowing | 00:32 | 05:21 to 04:49 | 10.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:30 | 05:49 to 05:19 | 10.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:30 | 06:55 to 06:25 | 10.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:11 | 05:04 to 04:53 | 3.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:49 to 02:49 | 0.0% |
| Engbersen Wanja | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:46 | 00:00 | 04:45 +01:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 05:46 | 04:29 +00:31 | 04:45 +01:01 |
| Running 2 | 05:03 | 10:46 | 05:06 -00:03 | 09:14 +01:32 |
| Sled Push | 02:49 | 15:49 | 03:00 -00:11 | 14:20 +01:29 |
| Running 3 | 05:16 | 18:38 | 05:33 -00:17 | 17:20 +01:18 |
| Sled Pull | 05:04 | 23:54 | 05:08 -00:04 | 22:53 +01:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 28:58 | 05:33 -00:15 | 28:01 +00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:49 | 34:16 | 05:38 +00:11 | 33:34 +00:42 |
| Running 5 | 05:23 | 40:05 | 05:44 -00:21 | 39:12 +00:53 |
| Rowing | 05:21 | 45:28 | 04:53 +00:28 | 44:56 +00:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 50:49 | 05:35 -00:04 | 49:49 +01:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:52 | 56:20 | 02:16 +00:36 | 55:24 +00:56 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 59:12 | 05:33 -00:01 | 57:40 +01:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:54 | 01:04:44 | 05:23 +00:31 | 01:03:13 +01:31 |
| Running 8 | 06:21 | 01:10:38 | 06:14 +00:07 | 01:08:36 +02:02 |
| Wall Balls | 06:55 | 01:16:59 | 06:49 +00:06 | 01:14:50 +02:09 |
| Roxzone | 05:08 | 01:28:53 | 07:14 -02:06 | 01:28:53 |
Based on the splits analysis, Wanja gained time in Running 2, Sled Push, Running 3, Sled Pull, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Wall Balls. He lost time in Running 1, Ski Erg, Burpees Broad Jump, Rowing, Farmers Carry, and Sandbag Lunges. The segments where he lost the most time were Run Total, Running 1, Sandbag Lunges, Best Lap, Ski Erg, Burpees Broad Jump, Farmers Carry, and Rowing. The Roxzone time was faster than average, indicating that Wanja had efficient transitions.
In conclusion, Wanja Engbersen had a strong performance in the 2023 Maastricht European Championships HYROX race. To improve his performance, he should focus on improving his running speed and endurance, increasing his upper body strength and improving his technique on the Ski Erg, improving his explosive power and agility for the Burpees Broad Jump, and increasing his leg and core strength for the Sandbag Lunges. Implementing these training strategies and techniques, along with pacing himself effectively during the race, will help Wanja enhance his performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Müller Eric | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:29:19 | |
| Hmila Sophian | 2023 Paris | 01:29:19 | |
| Cooper Lee | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:07 | |
| Franke Patrick | 2019 Essen | 01:28:26 | |
| Johnson Michael | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:08 | |
| Dudley Gordon | 2024 Taipei | 01:28:24 | |
| Kelly Jamie | 2024 Manchester | 01:28:25 | |
| Twigg Olly | 2024 London | 01:29:18 | |
| Backes Stefan | 2018 Essen | 01:28:54 | |
| Browne Philip | 2024 Dublin | 01:29:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:28:13 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
