Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cheshire Craig's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cheshire Craig's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cheshire Craig's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cheshire Craig's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:49 | 06:46 to 05:57 | 43.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:33 | 06:08 to 05:35 | 29.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:52 to 04:34 | 15.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:07 | 05:28 to 05:21 | 6.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:06 | 07:15 to 07:09 | 5.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:01 to 03:01 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:21 to 43:21 | 0.0% |
| Cheshire Craig | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:01 | 00:00 | 04:58 +01:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 06:01 | 04:35 +00:17 | 04:58 +01:03 |
| Running 2 | 05:05 | 10:53 | 05:23 -00:18 | 09:33 +01:20 |
| Sled Push | 03:01 | 15:58 | 03:11 -00:10 | 14:56 +01:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:19 | 18:59 | 05:52 -00:33 | 18:07 +00:52 |
| Sled Pull | 05:28 | 24:18 | 05:30 -00:02 | 23:59 +00:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:20 | 29:46 | 05:52 -00:32 | 29:29 +00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:46 | 35:06 | 06:13 +00:33 | 35:21 -00:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 41:52 | 06:05 -00:34 | 41:34 +00:18 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 47:23 | 05:02 -00:06 | 47:39 -00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:19 | 52:19 | 05:54 -00:35 | 52:41 -00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 57:38 | 02:25 -00:16 | 58:35 -00:57 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 59:47 | 05:52 -00:48 | 01:01:00 -01:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:08 | 01:04:51 | 05:50 +00:18 | 01:06:52 -02:01 |
| Running 8 | 05:45 | 01:10:59 | 06:47 -01:02 | 01:12:42 -01:43 |
| Wall Balls | 07:15 | 01:16:44 | 07:30 -00:15 | 01:19:29 -02:45 |
| Roxzone | 11:13 | 01:35:05 | 08:06 +03:07 | 01:35:05 |
Craig Cheshire has showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. The fact that he has secured the top 48% overall rank among 4107 athletes and the top 47% rank in his age group (40-44), is a testament to his athletic prowess. He seems to have a strong running profile, having completed the race with a total running time of 00:43:21, which is 03:41 faster than the average. This is further reflected in the individual running segments where he consistently clocked faster timings than the average. However, he started off slower than average in Running 1, indicating a potential issue with pacing.
Given Craig's strong running profile, he could benefit from starting the race at a slightly faster pace. Maintaining a consistent speed throughout can help improve his overall time. Additionally, focusing on efficient transitions between exercise zones can help save precious seconds during the race. Including specific drills for each exercise segment in his training routine can also help improve his performance in those areas. Lastly, focusing on recovery and nutrition can ensure he remains in peak physical condition for the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rollin Arnaud | 2023 Paris | 01:35:21 | |
| Tomlinson David | 2023 Birmingham | 01:34:56 | |
| Di Siena Gianluca | 2024 Rimini | 01:35:06 | |
| Kunz Jascha | 2018 Hamburg | 01:34:54 | |
| Plasmeijer Frank | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:35:13 | |
| Nera Simone Ettore | 2023 Milan | 01:35:30 | |
| Oosterbaan Edwin | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:35:06 | |
| Cox Tanner | 2021 Chicago | 01:35:28 | |
| Mensah Ben | 2024 London | 01:34:57 | |
| Sousa Duilio | 2023 Valencia | 01:35:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
