Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ash Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ash Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ash Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ash Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:51 | 05:35 to 04:44 | 56.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:23 | 05:58 to 05:35 | 25.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:27 to 02:11 | 17.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:38 to 02:38 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:49 to 05:49 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:16 to 05:16 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:50 to 45:50 | 0.0% |
| Ash Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:27 | 00:00 | 05:14 +01:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 06:27 | 05:10 -00:10 | 05:14 +01:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 11:27 | 05:35 -00:15 | 10:24 +01:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 16:47 | 02:49 -00:11 | 15:59 +00:48 |
| Running 3 | 05:33 | 19:25 | 05:51 -00:18 | 18:48 +00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 05:58 | 24:58 | 05:58 +00:00 | 24:39 +00:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:43 | 30:56 | 05:54 -00:11 | 30:37 +00:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:49 | 36:39 | 06:25 -00:36 | 36:31 +00:08 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 42:28 | 06:04 -00:23 | 42:56 -00:28 |
| Rowing | 05:16 | 48:09 | 05:26 -00:10 | 49:00 -00:51 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 53:25 | 05:56 -00:17 | 54:26 -01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:27 | 59:04 | 02:18 +00:09 | 01:00:22 -01:18 |
| Running 7 | 05:30 | 01:01:31 | 05:55 -00:25 | 01:02:40 -01:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:04 | 01:07:01 | 04:59 -00:55 | 01:08:35 -01:34 |
| Running 8 | 06:01 | 01:11:05 | 06:24 -00:23 | 01:13:34 -02:29 |
| Wall Balls | 05:35 | 01:17:06 | 05:14 +00:21 | 01:19:58 -02:52 |
| Roxzone | 09:52 | 01:32:24 | 07:12 +02:40 | 01:32:24 |
Sarah Ash showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox event, landing in the top 15% of all athletes and her age group. Her total running time was 01:28 faster than the average, indicating that she has a strong runner profile. However, her performance in the Roxzone segment was slower than average, suggesting a need to improve overall fitness and transition times. Looking at the first four running segments, it seems Sarah started the race slower than average but picked up speed as the race progressed.
Based on Sarah's performance in this race, a few strategies she could adopt for future events include:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fogarty Dani | 2022 Chicago | 01:32:35 | |
| Wieting Julia | 2022 München | 01:32:24 | |
| Ash Sarah | 2024 Birmingham | 01:32:24 | |
| Nedlahcen Selma | 2024 Maastricht | 01:32:32 | |
| Misso Kirsty | 2024 Malaga | 01:32:24 | |
| Weir Karen | 2022 Manchester | 01:31:56 | |
| Hanegraaf Tamara | 2024 Perth | 01:32:50 | |
| OBrien Ellen | 2024 Madrid | 01:32:50 | |
| Lauscher Carmen | 2022 Essen | 01:32:29 | |
| Wrobel Martha | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:32:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
