Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hall Toby's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hall Toby's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hall Toby's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hall Toby's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:55 | 50:22 to 45:27 | 77.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:12 | 07:06 to 05:54 | 18.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:33 to 02:19 | 3.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:43 to 02:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:31 to 05:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:04 to 06:04 | 0.0% |
| Hall Toby | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:57 | 00:00 | 04:56 +00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 04:57 | 04:34 +00:00 | 04:56 +00:01 |
| Running 2 | 06:03 | 09:31 | 05:22 +00:41 | 09:30 +00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 15:34 | 03:11 -00:28 | 14:52 +00:42 |
| Running 3 | 06:24 | 18:17 | 05:52 +00:32 | 18:03 +00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 04:11 | 24:41 | 05:30 -01:19 | 23:55 +00:46 |
| Running 4 | 06:28 | 28:52 | 05:51 +00:37 | 29:25 -00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:06 | 35:20 | 06:09 +00:57 | 35:16 +00:04 |
| Running 5 | 06:39 | 42:26 | 06:04 +00:35 | 41:25 +01:01 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 49:05 | 05:00 -00:18 | 47:29 +01:36 |
| Running 6 | 06:33 | 53:47 | 05:53 +00:40 | 52:29 +01:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:33 | 01:00:20 | 02:24 +00:09 | 58:22 +01:58 |
| Running 7 | 06:32 | 01:02:53 | 05:52 +00:40 | 01:00:46 +02:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:31 | 01:09:25 | 05:44 -00:13 | 01:06:38 +02:47 |
| Running 8 | 06:49 | 01:14:56 | 06:42 +00:07 | 01:12:22 +02:34 |
| Wall Balls | 06:04 | 01:21:45 | 07:26 -01:22 | 01:19:04 +02:41 |
| Roxzone | 06:44 | 01:34:26 | 07:56 -01:12 | 01:34:26 |
Toby's best running lap was 00:04:57, which was 00:12 slower than the average. Analyzing the splits, it is evident that Toby struggled in several running segments, such as Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and the Best Lap. These segments accounted for the most time lost during the race. Additionally, the Burpees Broad Jump segment was a significant challenge for Toby, as he was 01:20 slower than the average.
In conclusion, Toby Hall performed well in the HYROX race, but there are areas for improvement. By focusing on his running performance, particularly in the identified segments, and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Toby can enhance his overall performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dandrea Marco | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:04 | |
| Ho Derek | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:34:13 | |
| Cramant Ben | 2023 London | 01:34:10 | |
| Lee Jian Ler | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:33:57 | |
| Williams Tommy | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:06 | |
| Van Asdonck Humphry | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:03 | |
| 张 家钊 | 2024 Beijing | 01:34:05 | |
| Gutierrez Emmanuel | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:34:49 | |
| Shabbir Subhaan | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:04 | |
| Garrett Timothy | 2022 Dallas | 01:34:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
