Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Vorechovsky Martin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Vorechovsky Martin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Vorechovsky Martin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Vorechovsky Martin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:35 | 08:26 to 05:51 | 55.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:11 | 08:13 to 07:02 | 25.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:45 | 06:15 to 05:30 | 16.0% |
| Run Total | 00:11 | 45:26 to 45:15 | 3.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:23 to 02:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Vorechovsky Martin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:22 | 00:00 | 04:54 +00:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 05:22 | 04:33 -00:02 | 04:54 +00:28 |
| Running 2 | 04:53 | 09:53 | 05:21 -00:28 | 09:27 +00:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 14:46 | 03:12 -00:49 | 14:48 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:16 | 17:09 | 05:51 -00:35 | 18:00 -00:51 |
| Sled Pull | 04:10 | 22:25 | 05:29 -01:19 | 23:51 -01:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 26:35 | 05:51 -00:16 | 29:20 -02:45 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:26 | 32:10 | 06:07 +02:19 | 35:11 -03:01 |
| Running 5 | 05:42 | 40:36 | 06:03 -00:21 | 41:18 -00:42 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 46:18 | 05:00 -00:07 | 47:21 -01:03 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 51:11 | 05:53 -00:07 | 52:21 -01:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 56:57 | 02:23 -00:17 | 58:14 -01:17 |
| Running 7 | 05:40 | 59:03 | 05:51 -00:11 | 01:00:37 -01:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:15 | 01:04:43 | 05:42 +00:33 | 01:06:28 -01:45 |
| Running 8 | 07:15 | 01:10:58 | 06:41 +00:34 | 01:12:10 -01:12 |
| Wall Balls | 08:13 | 01:18:13 | 07:24 +00:49 | 01:18:51 -00:38 |
| Roxzone | 07:49 | 01:34:07 | 07:52 -00:03 | 01:34:07 |
Martin Vorechovsky performed commendably in the 2024 Poznan HYROX race, securing a rank in the top 72% overall and top 69% in his age group (40-44). His total running time of 45:26 was faster than the average by 01:15, suggesting a strong runner profile. However, the same cannot be said about his strength and transition times in between the exercise zones. His Roxzone time was exactly average, indicating an area for improvement in overall fitness and transition time. His running pace in the first segment was slower than average, but he was able to recover and maintain a faster pace in the following segments.
There are several segments where Vorechovsky's performance was below average, most notably:
Martin should consider implementing the following strategies to improve his performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermeulen Sven | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:34:12 | |
| Schulzki Dieter | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:34:10 | |
| Lim Kwang Ren | 2024 Singapore | 01:34:34 | |
| George Joe | 2024 Dublin | 01:33:59 | |
| Cozzi Mattia | 2024 Milan | 01:34:24 | |
| Schultz Mark | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:34:08 | |
| Chan Andrew | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:34:17 | |
| Klimek Jan | 2024 Gdansk | 01:34:02 | |
| Mavros Paulie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:16 | |
| Kramer Rick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:33:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
