Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 400 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Praag Lucas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Praag Lucas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Praag Lucas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Praag Lucas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:37 | 01:00:10 to 55:33 | 67.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:52 | 09:07 to 08:15 | 12.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:28 | 08:04 to 07:36 | 6.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 | 05:22 to 04:59 | 5.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:18 | 07:28 to 07:10 | 4.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 03:14 to 03:04 | 2.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:18 to 03:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:12 to 08:12 | 0.0% |
| Van Praag Lucas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:19 | 00:00 | 05:55 +01:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:22 | 07:19 | 04:58 +00:24 | 05:55 +01:24 |
| Running 2 | 06:35 | 12:41 | 06:24 +00:11 | 10:53 +01:48 |
| Sled Push | 03:18 | 19:16 | 04:05 -00:47 | 17:17 +01:59 |
| Running 3 | 07:10 | 22:34 | 07:14 -00:04 | 21:22 +01:12 |
| Sled Pull | 07:28 | 29:44 | 07:18 +00:10 | 28:36 +01:08 |
| Running 4 | 07:02 | 37:12 | 07:17 -00:15 | 35:54 +01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:07 | 44:14 | 08:26 +00:41 | 43:11 +01:03 |
| Running 5 | 07:38 | 53:21 | 07:46 -00:08 | 51:37 +01:44 |
| Rowing | 05:24 | 01:00:59 | 05:33 -00:09 | 59:23 +01:36 |
| Running 6 | 07:08 | 01:06:23 | 07:22 -00:14 | 01:04:56 +01:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:14 | 01:13:31 | 02:57 +00:17 | 01:12:18 +01:13 |
| Running 7 | 07:43 | 01:16:45 | 07:25 +00:18 | 01:15:15 +01:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:04 | 01:24:28 | 07:57 +00:07 | 01:22:40 +01:48 |
| Running 8 | 09:40 | 01:32:32 | 09:37 +00:03 | 01:30:37 +01:55 |
| Wall Balls | 08:12 | 01:42:12 | 10:12 -02:00 | 01:40:14 +01:58 |
| Roxzone | 11:19 | 02:01:32 | 11:06 +00:13 | 02:01:32 |
Lucas Van Praag finished in the top 68% of his age group and overall participants, with a total time of 02:01:32. His performance suggests a balanced athlete with both running and strength capabilities, but with room for improvement in endurance and transitions. His total running time was slower than average, indicating a need for enhanced running efficiency or stamina. Lucas's strongest segments were the Sled Push and Wall Balls, where he exceeded average performance significantly. However, his early running laps suggest he started slower than average, indicating a potential need for better pacing at the beginning of the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Marzano Michele | 2024 Manchester | 02:01:02 | |
| Patil Nikhil | 2023 Melbourne | 02:01:32 | |
| Lembke Christopher | 2023 Hamburg | 02:01:50 | |
| Brown Dan | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 02:01:42 | |
| Yew Alvin | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:01:54 | |
| Dave Dave | 2024 Manchester | 02:01:49 | |
| Kim Geonmin | 2024 Incheon | 02:01:33 | |
| Ong Kai Min | 2023 Singapore | 02:01:53 | |
| Langlitz Dan | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 02:01:22 | |
| Mcquattie Rob | 2024 Manchester | 02:01:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
