Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Den Hudding Eric's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Den Hudding Eric's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Den Hudding Eric's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Den Hudding Eric's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:04 | 50:22 to 46:18 | 77.7% |
| Wall Balls | 01:00 | 08:20 to 07:20 | 19.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:10 | 06:16 to 06:06 | 3.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:02 to 03:02 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Van Den Hudding Eric | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:07 | 00:00 | 04:59 -00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 04:07 | 04:37 -00:05 | 04:59 -00:52 |
| Running 2 | 08:37 | 08:39 | 05:25 +03:12 | 09:36 -00:57 |
| Sled Push | 03:02 | 17:16 | 03:15 -00:13 | 15:01 +02:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:43 | 20:18 | 05:59 -00:16 | 18:16 +02:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:46 | 26:01 | 05:39 -00:53 | 24:15 +01:46 |
| Running 4 | 06:10 | 30:47 | 05:56 +00:14 | 29:54 +00:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:16 | 36:57 | 06:20 -00:04 | 35:50 +01:07 |
| Running 5 | 06:01 | 43:13 | 06:10 -00:09 | 42:10 +01:03 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 49:14 | 05:03 -00:10 | 48:20 +00:54 |
| Running 6 | 05:59 | 54:07 | 05:59 +00:00 | 53:23 +00:44 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 01:00:06 | 02:26 -00:35 | 59:22 +00:44 |
| Running 7 | 06:25 | 01:01:57 | 05:57 +00:28 | 01:01:48 +00:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:13 | 01:08:22 | 05:55 -00:42 | 01:07:45 +00:37 |
| Running 8 | 07:24 | 01:13:35 | 06:51 +00:33 | 01:13:40 -00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 08:20 | 01:20:59 | 07:42 +00:38 | 01:20:31 +00:28 |
| Roxzone | 07:19 | 01:36:29 | 08:16 -00:57 | 01:36:29 |
Eric Van Den Hudding delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 52% overall. His overall time was 01:36:29, placing him in the top 54% of his age group (35-39). Despite a slower total running time by 02:39 compared to the average, Eric displayed strong strength components, particularly in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry events. His performance indicates a hybrid athlete profile, with a slight edge in strength elements. Notably, Eric started the race at a fast pace in Running 1, indicating a possible pacing strategy that could be optimized for consistent performance throughout the event.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Flack Jon | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:35:59 | |
| Bottoms Madison | 2024 Dallas | 01:36:20 | |
| Schaper Mike | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:36:52 | |
| Ladd Gibbon Ben | 2023 Malmö | 01:36:32 | |
| Selgrad Michael | 2024 Maastricht | 01:36:32 | |
| Leest Jastin | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:36:36 | |
| Wawer Lennard | 2019 Hannover | 01:36:57 | |
| Van Der Aa Koen | 2024 Maastricht | 01:36:54 | |
| Parsons Daniel | 2024 Cape Town | 01:36:53 | |
| Lindsay Stefan | 2024 London | 01:36:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:39:23 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
