Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tesselaar Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tesselaar Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tesselaar Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tesselaar Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:59 | 44:48 to 40:49 | 78.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:38 | 02:37 to 01:59 | 12.5% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:51 to 04:41 | 3.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 02:46 to 02:37 | 3.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:28 to 04:20 | 2.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Tesselaar Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:58 | 00:00 | 04:31 -00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 03:58 | 04:24 +00:04 | 04:31 -00:33 |
| Running 2 | 05:40 | 08:26 | 04:52 +00:48 | 08:55 -00:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 14:06 | 02:51 -00:05 | 13:47 +00:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:53 | 16:52 | 05:17 +00:36 | 16:38 +00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 04:02 | 22:45 | 04:48 -00:46 | 21:55 +00:50 |
| Running 4 | 05:50 | 26:47 | 05:15 +00:35 | 26:43 +00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:38 | 32:37 | 05:06 -00:28 | 31:58 +00:39 |
| Running 5 | 05:49 | 37:15 | 05:25 +00:24 | 37:04 +00:11 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 43:04 | 04:46 +00:05 | 42:29 +00:35 |
| Running 6 | 05:42 | 47:55 | 05:17 +00:25 | 47:15 +00:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:37 | 53:37 | 02:08 +00:29 | 52:32 +01:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:51 | 56:14 | 05:16 +00:35 | 54:40 +01:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:27 | 01:02:05 | 04:57 -00:30 | 59:56 +02:09 |
| Running 8 | 06:07 | 01:06:32 | 05:49 +00:18 | 01:04:53 +01:39 |
| Wall Balls | 05:35 | 01:12:39 | 06:17 -00:42 | 01:10:42 +01:57 |
| Roxzone | 05:27 | 01:23:33 | 06:34 -01:07 | 01:23:33 |
Daniel Tesselaar delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 30% overall and the top 33% in his age group. Despite a strong overall ranking, Daniel's total running time was 2:40 slower than average, suggesting that running is an area for potential improvement. His strongest performances were in strength-based exercises, with standout times in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls, indicating a robust strength profile. Daniel's pacing started strong with a faster-than-average Running 1 split but gradually slowed down throughout the race, suggesting he may have started too fast, leading to fatigue in later segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stridde Martin | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:23:59 | |
| Verrest Stijn | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:43 | |
| Craft Ben | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:08 | |
| Luong Tan Trung | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:23:04 | |
| Mazur Grzegorz | 2024 Poznan | 01:23:32 | |
| Hille Christian | 2024 Maastricht | 01:23:44 | |
| Vasquez Alejandro | 2024 Paris | 01:23:34 | |
| Pietro Kevin | 2023 Chicago | 01:24:02 | |
| Heinrich Jasper | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:23:35 | |
| Goodman Jason | 2023 London | 01:23:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:31:02 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
