Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sman Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sman Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sman Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sman Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:13 | 47:28 to 45:15 | 59.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:55 | 06:25 to 05:30 | 24.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:20 | 06:11 to 05:51 | 8.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:44 to 04:33 | 4.9% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:03 to 04:57 | 2.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:23 to 02:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:43 to 01:43 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:24 to 06:24 | 0.0% |
| Sman Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:58 | 00:00 | 04:53 +01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 05:58 | 04:34 +00:10 | 04:53 +01:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:35 | 10:42 | 05:20 +00:15 | 09:27 +01:15 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 16:17 | 03:11 -00:48 | 14:47 +01:30 |
| Running 3 | 05:58 | 18:40 | 05:50 +00:08 | 17:58 +00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 04:51 | 24:38 | 05:29 -00:38 | 23:48 +00:50 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 29:29 | 05:49 -00:14 | 29:17 +00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:11 | 35:04 | 06:07 +00:04 | 35:06 -00:02 |
| Running 5 | 06:19 | 41:15 | 06:02 +00:17 | 41:13 +00:02 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 47:34 | 04:59 +00:04 | 47:15 +00:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 52:37 | 05:52 -00:21 | 52:14 +00:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:43 | 58:08 | 02:23 -00:40 | 58:06 +00:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 59:51 | 05:50 -00:13 | 01:00:29 -00:38 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:25 | 01:05:28 | 05:41 +00:44 | 01:06:19 -00:51 |
| Running 8 | 06:59 | 01:11:53 | 06:39 +00:20 | 01:12:00 -00:07 |
| Wall Balls | 06:24 | 01:18:52 | 07:26 -01:02 | 01:18:39 +00:13 |
| Roxzone | 08:48 | 01:33:57 | 07:52 +00:56 | 01:33:57 |
Mark Sman's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race placed him in the top 49% overall and the top 48% in his age group, indicating a commendable level of fitness and competitiveness. Mark demonstrated a strong proficiency in strength-based segments, excelling in the Sled Push, Farmers Carry, and Wall Balls with significant time advantages over the average. However, the total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting that Mark may have a stronger inclination towards strength rather than running. The initial running segments indicate a slower start, which may have been a strategic decision or a pacing issue. Overall, Mark's performance is indicative of a hybrid profile with a slight strength emphasis.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Eriksson Henrik | 2024 Stockholm | 01:33:48 | |
| 이 동우 | 2024 Incheon | 01:34:24 | |
| Pizzo Sebastiano Antonio | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:34:08 | |
| Ossa Matthias | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:34:21 | |
| Ingendorn Sydnee | 2024 Hamburg | 01:33:36 | |
| Brewin Harvey | 2024 Singapore | 01:33:33 | |
| AlSaadi Mohammed | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:34:26 | |
| Butz Jochem | 2024 Maastricht | 01:33:31 | |
| Renzetti Marco | 2024 Turin | 01:33:58 | |
| Halkema Maarten | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:33:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
