Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Halkema Maarten's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Halkema Maarten's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Halkema Maarten's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Halkema Maarten's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:40 | 52:43 to 45:03 | 98.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:09 | 05:57 to 05:48 | 1.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:44 to 05:44 | 0.0% |
| Halkema Maarten | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:25 | 00:00 | 04:52 -00:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 04:25 | 04:33 -00:10 | 04:52 -00:27 |
| Running 2 | 05:59 | 08:48 | 05:19 +00:40 | 09:25 -00:37 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 14:47 | 03:11 -00:45 | 14:44 +00:03 |
| Running 3 | 06:08 | 17:13 | 05:48 +00:20 | 17:55 -00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 04:07 | 23:21 | 05:29 -01:22 | 23:43 -00:22 |
| Running 4 | 05:59 | 27:28 | 05:48 +00:11 | 29:12 -01:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:57 | 33:27 | 06:05 -00:08 | 35:00 -01:33 |
| Running 5 | 06:27 | 39:24 | 06:00 +00:27 | 41:05 -01:41 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 45:51 | 04:58 -00:15 | 47:05 -01:14 |
| Running 6 | 06:21 | 50:34 | 05:50 +00:31 | 52:03 -01:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 56:55 | 02:22 -00:19 | 57:53 -00:58 |
| Running 7 | 06:20 | 58:58 | 05:49 +00:31 | 01:00:15 -01:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:59 | 01:05:18 | 05:41 -00:42 | 01:06:04 -00:46 |
| Running 8 | 11:08 | 01:10:17 | 06:37 +04:31 | 01:11:45 -01:28 |
| Wall Balls | 05:44 | 01:21:25 | 07:26 -01:42 | 01:18:22 +03:03 |
| Roxzone | 06:38 | 01:33:40 | 07:52 -01:14 | 01:33:40 |
Maarten Halkema's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race was commendable, placing him in the top 48% overall and top 47% in his age group. His strength-based segments were notably strong, with impressive times in both the Sled Push and Sled Pull, ranking him in the top 13% and 8% respectively. However, his total running time was significantly slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in running endurance and speed. His pacing started strongly, with an excellent time in Running 1, but slowed down considerably in later running segments, especially Running 8. This suggests that he may have started too fast, leading to fatigue later in the race. Overall, Maarten shows a stronger profile in strength-based activities, but there is room for improvement in running to achieve a more balanced, hybrid fitness profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Qaabil Ibrahim | 2021 New York | 01:34:06 | |
| Van Der Beek Floris | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:34:08 | |
| Wilson Derek | 2022 Birmingham | 01:33:54 | |
| Mullan Mark | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:33:57 | |
| Pelucchi Mauro | 2024 Turin | 01:34:04 | |
| Bevan Damian | 2024 Manchester | 01:33:13 | |
| Schmook Markus | 2022 Bremen | 01:33:25 | |
| Aegerter Kilian | 2024 Hamburg | 01:33:21 | |
| Lescuyer Denis | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:34:00 | |
| Lapsins Uldis | 2023 Glasgow | 01:33:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
