Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rouwenhorst Frank's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rouwenhorst Frank's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rouwenhorst Frank's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rouwenhorst Frank's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:38 | 51:18 to 45:40 | 90.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 | 04:50 to 04:34 | 4.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:34 to 02:19 | 4.0% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:04 to 04:58 | 1.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:30 to 05:30 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:58 to 06:58 | 0.0% |
| Rouwenhorst Frank | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:37 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:50 | 04:37 | 04:35 +00:15 | 04:58 -00:21 |
| Running 2 | 06:13 | 09:27 | 05:23 +00:50 | 09:33 -00:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:20 | 15:40 | 03:12 -00:52 | 14:56 +00:44 |
| Running 3 | 06:23 | 18:00 | 05:53 +00:30 | 18:08 -00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:37 | 24:23 | 05:31 -00:54 | 24:01 +00:22 |
| Running 4 | 06:32 | 29:00 | 05:52 +00:40 | 29:32 -00:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:30 | 35:32 | 06:10 -00:40 | 35:24 +00:08 |
| Running 5 | 06:51 | 41:02 | 06:04 +00:47 | 41:34 -00:32 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 47:53 | 05:01 +00:03 | 47:38 +00:15 |
| Running 6 | 06:35 | 52:57 | 05:54 +00:41 | 52:39 +00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:34 | 59:32 | 02:24 +00:10 | 58:33 +00:59 |
| Running 7 | 06:37 | 01:02:06 | 05:53 +00:44 | 01:00:57 +01:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 01:08:43 | 05:47 -00:36 | 01:06:50 +01:53 |
| Running 8 | 07:32 | 01:13:54 | 06:46 +00:46 | 01:12:37 +01:17 |
| Wall Balls | 06:58 | 01:21:26 | 07:25 -00:27 | 01:19:23 +02:03 |
| Roxzone | 06:31 | 01:34:49 | 08:01 -01:30 | 01:34:49 |
Frank Rouwenhorst delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking in the top 40% of his age group. His overall time of 01:34:49 places him in the top 50% among all participants, showcasing a solid balance of endurance and strength. Notably, Frank's strength-based exercises like the Sled Push and Sled Pull are standout strengths, where he performed significantly faster than the average. However, his total running time was 4:10 slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in running efficiency. Frank's pacing analysis suggests he started with a relatively strong pace in Running 1, but his performance declined in subsequent runs, pointing to potential fatigue or pacing strategy issues. Overall, Frank shows a slightly stronger profile in strength-based activities as compared to running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ngo Vincent | 2024 Melbourne | 01:35:05 | |
| Dino Steven Andrew Sebastian | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:34:22 | |
| Offerdahl Mark | 2021 New York | 01:34:20 | |
| Petri Sven | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:35:13 | |
| English Ronan | 2024 Dublin | 01:35:15 | |
| Köfalvi Philipp | 2019 Wien | 01:34:36 | |
| Civa Luca | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:35:12 | |
| Rashid Ramsay | 2023 London | 01:34:45 | |
| Lucchini Emmerik | 2024 Milan | 01:34:53 | |
| Piepel Felix | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:34:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
